Author Archives: Mike Jukic

Unknown's avatar

About Mike Jukic

During law school, Mike worked as a volunteer student lawyer for those without the means to obtain legal representation. Now an experienced litigator, Mike strives to represent his clients as efficiently and cost-effectively as possible.

Propaganda Due Lodge Lawsuit

Posted on by
Reply

[YOUR NAME] [Your Address]

[Your Phone Number]

[Your Email]

Plaintiff in Pro Per

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE [INSERT DISTRICT, e.g., CENTRAL] DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

[YOUR NAME], Plaintiff,Case No.: [To be assigned by Clerk]
v.COMPLAINT FOR:
LEO LYON ZAGAMI, Defendant.1. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
2. Harassment
3. [Other Claims]
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

  1. This Court has jurisdiction over this action because [e.g., the parties live in different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000].
  2. Venue is proper in this District because the events giving rise to the claim occurred within this judicial district.

II. PARTIES

  1. Plaintiff, [Your Name], is an individual residing in [City, State].
  2. Defendant, Leo Lyon Zagami, is an individual who, upon information and belief, resides in [City, State/Country] and operates as a public figure.

III. STATEMENT OF FACTS

(In this section, you must list the specific things the defendant did. Use numbered paragraphs.)

5. On or about [Date], Defendant began [describe specific actions].

6. Defendant allegedly utilized [describe the technology or methods mentioned, such as V2K].

7. These actions were directed at the Plaintiff and others with the intent to [describe the alleged goal, such as the harm to Father Greg Boyle].

8. As a result of these actions, Plaintiff has suffered [list specific harms, like psychological distress, loss of sleep, or fear].

IV. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

(Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)

9. Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 8.

10. The conduct of the Defendant was extreme and outrageous.

11. Defendant acted with the intent to cause, or reckless disregard for the probability of causing, severe emotional distress.

12. Plaintiff suffered severe emotional distress as a direct result of Defendant’s conduct.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests judgment against Defendant as follows:

  1. For general damages in an amount to be proven at trial;
  2. For punitive damages to punish and deter such conduct;
  3. For an injunction preventing Defendant from further contact or harassment;
  4. For such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.

Dated: December 25, 2025

Signed: __________________________

[Your Name], Plaintiff

Important Next Steps

  • Proof of Service: Filing the paper is only the first step. You must “serve” the defendant (have a third party deliver the papers) and file a Proof of Service with the court.
  • Legal Standards: Courts often dismiss cases involving “Voice to Skull” or “mind control” unless there is concrete, scientific evidence. Federal judges use the Twombly/Iqbal standard, meaning the claims must be “plausible” and not just “possible.”
  • Legal Aid: Because these claims are complex, you may want to contact a Pro Se Clinic at the courthouse where you plan to file.

Nick Rockefeller Vaccine Lawsuit

Posted on by
Reply

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE [INSERT DISTRICT]

BRUNO JUKIC, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of LUKA JUKIC, a minor, Plaintiff,

v.

NICK ROCKEFELLER, et al. Defendants.

Case No.: _

COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Plaintiff, BRUNO JUKIC, appearing pro se, brings this action against Defendant NICK ROCKEFELLER for damages arising from the neurological injury of his son, LUKA JUKIC, and alleges as follows:

I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action based on diversity of citizenship and federal questions regarding public health safety standards.

Venue is proper in this district as the injuries complained of occurred within this jurisdiction.

II. PARTIES
Plaintiff Bruno Jukic is a resident of [Insert State/City] and is the father of Luka Jukic.

Defendant Nick Rockefeller is identified as a representative of interests involved in global health policy and pharmaceutical influence.

III. STATEMENT OF FACTS
Medical Injury: Plaintiff alleges that Luka Jukic was administered vaccines containing mercury (Thimerosal/Quicksilver), which directly resulted in a diagnosis of autism and subsequent loss of verbal capacity.

Scientific & Literary Basis: Plaintiff cites the documentary Vaxxed (produced by Del Bigtree and championed by Robert De Niro) as evidence of a cover-up regarding the link between vaccines and autism.

Institutional Intent: Plaintiff references the work Murder by Injection by Eustace Mullins, alleging a long-standing conspiracy within the medical-industrial complex to weaken the population through mandatory injections.

IV. CAUSES OF ACTION
COUNT I: Strict Liability (Failure to Warn) 8. The Defendants promoted medical products without disclosing the neurotoxic risks of mercury derivatives.

COUNT II: Violation of Human Rights & Biblical Enigma 9. Plaintiff asserts that the mass vaccination program is an attempt to influence or “crack” biological codes related to Biblical prophecy, infringing upon the religious and bodily autonomy of the Jukic family.

COUNT III: Creation of Vulnerable Victims (Negligence) 10. Plaintiff alleges that by rendering children non-verbal through neurological injury, the Defendants have intentionally created a class of “helpless victims.” 11. Plaintiff cites the Casa Pia scandal in Portugal and the Madeleine McCann disappearance as evidence of a global climate where vulnerable or autistic children are targeted by predatory networks because they lack the verbal capacity to report abuse to authorities.

V. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests judgment against Defendants for:

Compensatory damages for Luka Jukic’s medical care and lifelong support;

Punitive damages for willful negligence;

A formal investigation into the intersection of pharmaceutical policy and child safety.

Dated: December 18, 2025 Signed: ______________ Bruno Jukic, Plaintiff

Hell’s Angels Lawsuit Against Mick Jagger

Posted on by
Reply

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE [INSERT DISTRICT]

THE HELLS ANGELS MOTORCYCLE CLUB, Plaintiff,

v.

SIR MICHAEL PHILIP JAGGER, SECRET INTELLIGENCE SERVICE (MI6), AND DOES 1-20, Defendants.

Case No: _________ COMPLAINT FOR: CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MURDER, RELIGIOUS EXPLOITATION, AND VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS

I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

  1. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter based on the diverse citizenship of the parties and the claims arising under international law and civil rights statutes.
  2. Venue is proper as the underlying events related to the “Satanic sacrifice” and the actions of the “Agent Provocateurs” occurred within this jurisdiction.

II. PARTIES

  1. Plaintiff: The Hells Angels Motorcycle Club (HAMC), an organization targeted for infiltration and manipulation.
  2. Defendant Mick Jagger: An individual who, Plaintiff alleges, suffers from messianic delusions and has claimed the identity of “Lucifer the Lightbringer” as referenced in Revelation 12 and 14.
  3. Defendant MI6: The British Secret Intelligence Service, alleged to have facilitated these actions through undercover operatives.

III. STATEMENT OF FACTS

  1. The Messianic Claims: Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Jagger claimed to be the master of the Hells Angels, equating the club to the “one-third of the ANGELS of heaven” cast down in the Book of Revelation.
  2. The Altamont Incident: Plaintiff alleges that the death of a Black man at the Altamont Free Concert was not an accident or a matter of security, but a pre-meditated “Satanic sacrifice” orchestrated by Jagger and MI6 agents.
  3. Infiltration: Plaintiff alleges that MI6 used agent provocateurs to manipulate members of the HAMC into participating in or taking the blame for this event to further Jagger’s “Luciferian” delusions.

IV. CAUSES OF ACTION

COUNT I: CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MURDER Defendants Jagger and MI6 did knowingly and willfully conspire to arrange the death of a human being for the purposes of a ritual sacrifice.

COUNT II: INCITEMENT AND EXPLOITATION Defendant Jagger used his influence and “messianic delusions” to attempt to subvert the leadership of the HAMC, causing internal strife and legal jeopardy for its members.

V. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court grant the following relief:

  • Criminal Referral: That the Court refer Defendant Jagger and his MI6 handlers for prosecution for the murder of the African man.
  • Incarceration: That Defendant Jagger and the identified MI6 agents be sentenced to one hundred (100) years in a high-security facility.
  • Internal Discipline: A judicial recommendation that any member of the HAMC found to have knowingly sided with Defendant Jagger in his “Luciferian” capacity serve one (1) day in jail as a symbolic purification and legal reprimand.
  • Damages: Punitive damages for the reputational harm caused to the Hells Angels.

Dated: December 18, 2025 Respectfully Submitted,

(Your Signature)

Important Considerations

  • Statute of Limitations: Most jurisdictions require a lawsuit for personal injury or wrongful death to be filed within 2–3 years of the event. To move forward, you would likely need to argue “fraudulent concealment” (that the MI6 involvement was hidden).
  • Sovereign Immunity: MI6, as a foreign government agency, generally has immunity from being sued in U.S. courts unless specific exceptions apply.