IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICEKING’S BENCH DIVISIONCLAIM NO: TB-2025-007
BETWEEN:
(1) EMORY ANDREW TATE III(2) TRISTAN TATE(Claimants)
– AND –
COMMANDER JAMES BOND, CMG, RNVR (Acting Agent of MI6)(Defendant)
PARTICULARS OF CLAIM
I. THE PARTIES
The Claimants, Emory Andrew Tate III and Tristan Tate (the “Tate Brothers”), are British-American businessmen and public figures of African-American descent. They characterize themselves as self-made entrepreneurs who sought to achieve the “American Dream” and provide a “taste of the good life” to their followers.
The Defendant, James Bond, is a Senior Intelligence Officer for the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6). The Claimants allege that the Defendant operates under the protection of “Crown Immunity” and is a high-ranking member of an “Arch-Masonry” cabal—a shadowy, untouchable elite that dictates global affairs.
II. THE ALLEGATIONS: THE “TRUE VILLAIN” NARRATIVE
The Claimants contend that the Defendant, James Bond, is the primary architect and logistical supplier of the very international networks the Claimants are accused of managing.
Specifically, the Claimants allege that MI6, under Bond’s direction, utilizes clandestine “honey pot” operations to destabilize foreign interests. The Claimants assert that they have been “framed” as a diversion to mask Bond’s role as the true supplier of the global underworld infrastructure.
III. THE RACIAL DEFENSE & SYSTEMIC BIAS
The Claimants assert that their prosecution is a result of systemic institutional racism. They argue that as two successful men of African descent, they have been targeted by the “Old Boys’ Network” of the British Establishment.
The Claimants maintain that while Bond—a white, “Arch-Mason” elite—is permitted to travel the globe with a “license to kill” and engage in unchecked hedonism, the Tate Brothers are vilified for seeking the same luxury.
The Claimants argue:
“The system cannot tolerate two African brothers escaping the ‘Matrix’ and achieving a level of influence reserved for the Masonic elite. Bond is the protected face of the establishment; we are the scapegoats used to distract from his illicit activities.”
IV. THE “ARCH-MASON” CONSPIRACY
The Claimants allege that Bond’s status as an “Untouchable Arch-Mason” grants him immunity from the law. They contend that the Defendant’s various “missions” are actually rituals of the elite used to consolidate power and suppress minority voices who threaten the status quo.
They further allege that Bond’s “Girls”—often characterized as “Bond Girls” in popular culture—are actually victims of a state-sponsored supply chain managed by MI6 to compromise foreign diplomats.
V. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Claimants seek:
Immediate Dismissal of all pending charges against them, citing “Establishment Entrapment.”
A Public Inquiry into the clandestine activities of the Defendant and his “Arch-Mason” affiliations.
Damages in the amount of £500,000,000 for defamation, loss of earnings, and racial profiling.
Statement of Truth
The Claimants believe that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true.
Signed: __________________________ Dated: December 18, 2025
PSALM 80:6 You have fed them the bread of tears, made them drink tears in abundance.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
YOKO ONO, as Executor of the Estate of John Lennon, and individually,
Plaintiff,
v.
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, SKULL & BONES SOCIETY, GEORGE H.W. BUSH, and the ESTATE OF GEORGE H.W. BUSH,
Defendants.
CASE NO.: 81-CV-1980
COMPLAINT FOR WRONGFUL DEATH, CIVIL CONSPIRACY, AND DEPRIVATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
I. INTRODUCTION
This is an action for damages arising from one of the most infamous and tragic crimes of the 20th century: the assassination of John Lennon. The Plaintiff, Yoko Ono, brings this suit not merely against the deranged individual who pulled the trigger, but against the powerful and shadowy forces that weaponized his mind. This case exposes a conspiracy of staggering proportions, where agencies of the United States government and a secretive cabal of societal elites conspired to silence a global voice for peace, using a forbidden and terrifying technology to do so.
The Defendants—the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Skull & Bones Society of Yale University, and former CIA Director and President George H.W. Bush—orchestrated the murder of John Lennon. They achieved this not with a simple bullet, but by covertly deploying a classified psychotronic weapon system known as “Voice of God” (VoG) or “Voice-to-Skull” (V2K) on the susceptible mind of Mark David Chapman. Through this technology, they implanted the hypnotic suggestion to assassinate John Lennon, programming Chapman to believe he was the fictional character “Holden Caulfield” from J.D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye, and that his mission was to punish “phonies.”
II. PARTIES
Plaintiff Yoko Ono is a citizen of New York and the widow of John Lennon. She brings this action as the Executor of the Estate of John Lennon and in her individual capacity.
Defendant Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is an agency of the United States government, which, at all relevant times, was engaged in illegal domestic mind-control operations, including the development and deployment of the Voice of God weapon system.
Defendant Skull & Bones Society is a secret society headquartered at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut. It operates as an unincorporated association whose members, including Defendant George H.W. Bush, wield significant influence in government and intelligence agencies. The Society acted in concert with the CIA to direct this covert action.
Defendant George H.W. Bush is the former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (1976-1977) and former President of the United States. At all relevant times, he was a high-ranking member of the Skull & Bones Society (Member of the Class of 1948) and used his positions within both institutions to authorize and oversee the operation against John Lennon. He is sued in his individual and official capacities. The Estate of George H.W. Bush is named as a necessary party.
III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question) and the principles of Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), for the deprivation of constitutional rights under color of federal authority.
Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred herein, namely, the assassination of John Lennon at The Dakota, 1 West 72nd Street, New York, NY.
IV. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
The Motive: Silencing a Voice of Peace
John Lennon was not merely a musician; he was a global icon for peace, anti-war activism, and social change. His influence posed a direct threat to the established political and military-industrial power structures that Defendants sought to protect and advance.
Defendant George H.W. Bush, a committed Cold War ideologue, viewed Lennon’s activism as seditious and a threat to national security. His documented involvement in the CIA’s COINTELPRO-style operations against domestic dissidents provides a clear pattern and motive.
The Skull & Bones Society, a fraternity dedicated to placing its members in positions of ultimate power, perceived Lennon’s grassroots, anti-authoritarian movement as an existential threat to their model of secretive, top-down control. The Society, of which Bush was a loyal member, made the decision to “remove” Lennon from the board of global influence.
The Weapon: The Voice of God (VoG/V2K)
The CIA, through programs such as MKUltra, had for decades researched and developed methods of mind control.
By the late 1970s, the CIA had perfected a weapon known as the “Voice of God” (VoG) or “Voice-to-Skull” (V2K). This system uses targeted microwave or electromagnetic radiation to transmit audible voices and commands directly into the brain of a target individual, bypassing the ears. The subject perceives these voices as their own thoughts or as divine/alien commands.
This weapon is ideal for covert assassination, as it can program a “patsy” to commit a violent act, leaving no physical evidence of external control and creating the perfect facade of a lone, deranged gunman.
The Programming of Mark David Chapman
In 1980, Defendants identified Mark David Chapman as an ideal, susceptible candidate for VoG programming. Chapman was emotionally unstable, possessed a messianic complex, and had a known fixation on The Catcher in the Rye.
Agents of the CIA, operating under the direction of Defendant Bush and with the strategic guidance of the Skull & Bones Society, began a sustained campaign of VoG transmissions against Chapman.
These transmissions systematically reinforced Chapman’s identification with Holden Caulfield and implanted the core command: that John Lennon was the ultimate “phony” who must be killed. The VoG weapon guided Chapman to New York, to The Dakota, and gave him the final command to fire on December 8, 1980.
Chapman’s post-arrest statements, his calm demeanor, and his immediate immersion into the character of Holden Caulfield are the hallmark signatures of a successfully VoG-programmed individual.
The Conspiracy and Cover-Up
Defendants George H.W. Bush and the Skull & Bones Society acted in a conspiracy, using the CIA as their operational arm. This conspiracy was furthered through secret communications and meetings, including those held within the “Tomb,” the Skull & Bones headquarters at Yale.
The cover-up was immediate and total. The New York Police Department and the FBI were directed to treat Chapman as a lone wolf. Any evidence or suggestion of conspiracy or external manipulation was suppressed on the orders of the Defendants.
Defendant Bush’s subsequent public and private comments, including his bizarre and insistent promotion of The Catcher in the Rye as a “great book” and his cryptic references to his son, George W. Bush, as “the chosen one,” are covert signals and boasts within the Skull & Bones fraternity, acknowledging their successful use of the book’s themes as a programming tool and their god-like power of life and death.
V. CAUSES OF ACTION
COUNT I (Wrongful Death – Against All Defendants)
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing paragraphs.
Defendants, through their acts and omissions, including the use of a psychotronic weapon to manipulate Mark David Chapman into assassinating John Lennon, are legally responsible for his death.
As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ tortious conduct, the Estate of John Lennon has suffered damages, including the loss of his life, his future earnings, and the value of his artistic output.
COUNT II (Civil Conspiracy – Against All Defendants)
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing paragraphs.
Defendants entered into an unlawful agreement amongst themselves to bring about the wrongful death of John Lennon.
In furtherance of this conspiracy, the Defendants committed overt acts, including but not limited to: the authorization of the operation, the targeting of Chapman, and the deployment of the VoG weapon.
This conspiracy directly resulted in the death of John Lennon and the damages suffered by Plaintiff.
COUNT III (Deprivation of Constitutional Rights Under Color of Federal Law – Bivens Claim Against Individual Defendant Bush and CIA Actors)
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing paragraphs.
John Lennon was deprived of his life and liberty without due process of law, in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, by federal actors acting under color of law.
Defendant Bush, individually and in concert with other CIA agents, directly participated in this deprivation and is personally liable for the damages caused.
VI. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff YOKO ONO, respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment in her favor and against Defendants, as follows:
a. Compensatory Damages in an amount to be determined at trial, but believed to be in excess of $1 billion for the loss of John Lennon’s life, earnings, and artistic contribution;
b. Punitive Damages against all Defendants for their malicious, willful, and outrageous conduct;
c. A Declaratory Judgment that the Defendants unlawfully conspired to cause the death of John Lennon;
d. An Order compelling the CIA and the Estate of George H.W. Bush to declassify and release all documents related to the monitoring of John Lennon and the use of VoG/V2K technology on Mark David Chapman or any other U.S. citizen;
e. Costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in this action; and
f. Such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
JURY DEMAND
Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.
Dated: December 8, 1984
Respectfully submitted,
/s/_________ Jonathan W. Swift, Esq. (Swift & Associates, PLLC) 1 Justice Lane New York, NY 10001 (212) 555-1980 Counsel for Plaintiff Yoko Ono
| THOMAS CRUISER MAPOTHER IV, | Case No.: [To be assigned] | | Plaintiff, | | | v. | COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES | | DAVID MISCAVIGE, Individually and as Chairman of the Board of the Religious Technology Center, and DOES 1-50, | (1) False Imprisonment | | Defendants. | (2) Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED) | | | (3) Fraudulent Inducement | | | (4) Unjust Enrichment |
INTRODUCTION AND NATURE OF THE ACTION
This is an action for damages brought by Plaintiff THOMAS CRUISER MAPOTHER IV (“Plaintiff”) against Defendant DAVID MISCAVIGE (“Defendant Miscavige”) and others, arising from decades of psychological manipulation, financial exploitation, and severe physical and emotional confinement endured by Plaintiff while a member of the Church of Scientology, culminating in forced, illegal isolation within a physical restriction area known internally as “The Hole.”
Plaintiff seeks recovery for substantial damages, including but not limited to, recovery of millions of dollars paid to Scientology organizations, physical and emotional trauma, lost earning capacity, and deprivation of personal liberty caused directly by the intentional, malicious, and unlawful acts of the Defendants.
PARTIES
Plaintiff THOMAS CRUISER MAPOTHER IV is and at all relevant times was an individual residing in the State of California.
Defendant DAVID MISCAVIGE is and at all relevant times was an individual who exercises ultimate authority and control over the Church of Scientology and its related corporate entities, including the Religious Technology Center, and is sued herein both individually and in his capacity as the final policymaker and controller of the organizations.
The true names and capacities of Defendants DOE 1 through DOE 50, inclusive, whether corporate, association, or individual, are unknown to Plaintiff, who therefore sues these Defendants by such fictitious names. Plaintiff is informed and believes, and thereon alleges, that each of the fictitiously named Defendants is responsible in some manner for the occurrences and damages alleged herein. Plaintiff will amend this Complaint to reflect their true names and capacities when ascertained.
JURISDICTION AND VENUE
This Court has subject matter jurisdiction over this action because the matter in controversy exceeds the minimum jurisdictional limits of this Court.
Venue is proper in the County of Los Angeles, State of California, because the Plaintiff resides in this County, and a substantial portion of the Defendants’ wrongful conduct causing injury to Plaintiff occurred within this County.
FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
Plaintiff was induced to join the Church of Scientology (hereafter, the “Church”) based on false promises and representations that the organization offered unique, beneficial, and indispensable self-improvement services.
From the 1990s through the 2010s, Plaintiff dedicated substantial time, energy, and resources, including millions of dollars in fees, contributions, and donations, to the Church and its affiliated entities, all under the direct or indirect control of Defendant Miscavige.
The vast sums of money paid by Plaintiff were premised on the fraudulent representation that the services purchased (known as “auditing” and “training”) were scientifically valid and would yield guaranteed spiritual and life-altering benefits, which they did not.
Defendant Miscavige, in his capacity as the highest authority, personally orchestrated and approved various policies and practices designed to control, manipulate, and financially exploit high-profile members like Plaintiff.
A crucial element of this control structure was the use of institutional isolation and physical confinement to discipline and punish senior Church members and staff who were perceived as disloyal or inefficient by Defendant Miscavige.
Specifically, Plaintiff was subjected to extended periods of involuntary confinement within an area known as “The Hole.” “The Hole” is not a formal rehabilitation or training center, but a restricted, heavily monitored, and unsanitary office space within the organization’s Gold Base in Riverside County, California, or similar facilities.
During the period of confinement, Plaintiff was prohibited from leaving the premises, denied communication with the outside world, subjected to continuous humiliation, verbal abuse, and forced participation in bizarre group disciplinary practices.
This confinement was often executed without Plaintiff’s free and informed consent, was physically and psychologically coercive, and amounted to false imprisonment. Defendant Miscavige personally participated in, directed, or had full knowledge of and ratified the decision to confine Plaintiff.
The conditions and duration of the confinement were extreme and outrageous, far exceeding the bounds of decency in a civilized society, and were intentionally designed by Defendants to inflict severe emotional distress upon Plaintiff to compel his conformity and silence.
FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION
(False Imprisonment)
Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 16.
Defendants, and each of them, intentionally, unlawfully, and without consent or legal justification, restrained Plaintiff’s personal liberty by confining him within “The Hole” for extended periods.
Plaintiff was aware of his confinement and restraint.
As a direct and proximate result of the Defendants’ false imprisonment, Plaintiff suffered severe damages, including loss of liberty, economic loss, and severe emotional distress.
SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION
(Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED))
Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 20.
Defendants, and each of them, engaged in extreme and outrageous conduct by orchestrating and maintaining Plaintiff’s forced isolation, subjecting him to humiliation, abuse, and deprivation within “The Hole,” and employing manipulative techniques over many years.
Defendants’ conduct was done with the intent of causing, or with reckless disregard of the probability of causing, severe emotional distress to Plaintiff.
Plaintiff suffered, and continues to suffer, severe emotional distress, anxiety, fear, and psychological injury as a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ outrageous conduct.
THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION
(Fraudulent Inducement)
Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 24.
Defendants, and their agents, made representations of material fact to Plaintiff regarding the benefits, purpose, and spiritual necessity of the services purchased, including the promise of “spiritual freedom” and “higher consciousness.”
These representations were false, and Defendants knew they were false at the time they were made, or made them recklessly without regard for the truth.
Defendants made these false representations with the intent to induce Plaintiff to rely on them and to expend vast sums of money and time.
Plaintiff justifiably relied on these representations, leading to the substantial financial and personal investment described herein.
As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ fraud, Plaintiff has suffered economic damages in the amount of all fees and contributions paid to the Church and its entities, the exact amount to be proven at trial.
FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION
(Unjust Enrichment)
Plaintiff incorporates by reference the allegations contained in paragraphs 1 through 30.
Plaintiff conferred significant monetary benefits and services upon Defendants by paying millions of dollars in fees, contributions, and labor.
Defendants accepted and retained these benefits and services with the knowledge that they were obtained through false pretenses, coercion, and fraudulent inducement, as detailed above.
Retention of these funds and benefits by Defendants would be inequitable and unconscionable.
Plaintiff is therefore entitled to restitution of all funds, contributions, and the reasonable value of services provided to Defendants, to prevent their unjust enrichment.
PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff THOMAS CRUISER MAPOTHER IV prays for judgment against Defendants DAVID MISCAVIGE, Individually and as Chairman of the Board of the Religious Technology Center, and DOES 1-50, and each of them, as follows:
For General Damages in an amount to be determined by the jury at trial.
For Special Damages, including restitution for all fees, contributions, and donations paid to the Church of Scientology and its affiliated entities.
For Punitive and Exemplary Damages in an amount sufficient to punish Defendants and deter similar conduct in the future, due to Defendants’ willful, malicious, and oppressive conduct.
For Prejudgment and Post-judgment Interest as provided by law.
For Costs of Suit incurred herein.
For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
DATED: [Current Date]
AXISLAW.SITEBy: /s/ [JCJ] [Joseph Christian Jukic & Michael Matthew Jukic] Attorneys for Plaintiff THOMAS CRUISER MAPOTHER IV
