Author Archives: Mike Jukic

Unknown's avatar

About Mike Jukic

During law school, Mike worked as a volunteer student lawyer for those without the means to obtain legal representation. Now an experienced litigator, Mike strives to represent his clients as efficiently and cost-effectively as possible.

Parole For Jesus Lopez

Posted on by
Reply

Dear Members of the Parole Board,

My name is Jesus “Junior” Lopez, and I respectfully submit this letter to explain my situation and ask for your mercy and understanding.

Since my release, I have made a sincere effort to live an honest and lawful life. I obtained legitimate employment in Vancouver, working a regular 9-to-5 job and doing my best to support myself through legal means. I have tried to follow the rules placed before me and to build a stable life.

However, the reality of my financial situation has been extremely difficult. After paying for the basic necessities required to keep my job and maintain housing—gas for my car so I can commute to work, car insurance, rent, and the minimum payments on credit card debts—I often found myself with little or no money left for food. I was working full time but still struggling to meet the most basic needs of daily life.

I am not making excuses for my mistakes. I take responsibility for my actions. I simply want the Board to understand the hardship and pressure I was under while trying to remain employed and reintegrate into society. My intention has always been to work honestly and move forward in a better direction.

I respectfully ask the Court and the Parole Board to please have mercy and consider my efforts to live legitimately and support myself. I am committed to continuing to work, to follow the law, and to prove that I can be a productive member of the community.

Thank you for taking the time to read my letter and consider my circumstances.

Respectfully,

Jesus “Junior” Lopez

Propaganda Due Lodge Lawsuit

Posted on by
Reply

[YOUR NAME] [Your Address]

[Your Phone Number]

[Your Email]

Plaintiff in Pro Per

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE [INSERT DISTRICT, e.g., CENTRAL] DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

[YOUR NAME], Plaintiff,Case No.: [To be assigned by Clerk]
v.COMPLAINT FOR:
LEO LYON ZAGAMI, Defendant.1. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
2. Harassment
3. [Other Claims]
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

  1. This Court has jurisdiction over this action because [e.g., the parties live in different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000].
  2. Venue is proper in this District because the events giving rise to the claim occurred within this judicial district.

II. PARTIES

  1. Plaintiff, [Your Name], is an individual residing in [City, State].
  2. Defendant, Leo Lyon Zagami, is an individual who, upon information and belief, resides in [City, State/Country] and operates as a public figure.

III. STATEMENT OF FACTS

(In this section, you must list the specific things the defendant did. Use numbered paragraphs.)

5. On or about [Date], Defendant began [describe specific actions].

6. Defendant allegedly utilized [describe the technology or methods mentioned, such as V2K].

7. These actions were directed at the Plaintiff and others with the intent to [describe the alleged goal, such as the harm to Father Greg Boyle].

8. As a result of these actions, Plaintiff has suffered [list specific harms, like psychological distress, loss of sleep, or fear].

IV. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

(Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)

9. Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 8.

10. The conduct of the Defendant was extreme and outrageous.

11. Defendant acted with the intent to cause, or reckless disregard for the probability of causing, severe emotional distress.

12. Plaintiff suffered severe emotional distress as a direct result of Defendant’s conduct.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests judgment against Defendant as follows:

  1. For general damages in an amount to be proven at trial;
  2. For punitive damages to punish and deter such conduct;
  3. For an injunction preventing Defendant from further contact or harassment;
  4. For such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.

Dated: December 25, 2025

Signed: __________________________

[Your Name], Plaintiff

Important Next Steps

  • Proof of Service: Filing the paper is only the first step. You must “serve” the defendant (have a third party deliver the papers) and file a Proof of Service with the court.
  • Legal Standards: Courts often dismiss cases involving “Voice to Skull” or “mind control” unless there is concrete, scientific evidence. Federal judges use the Twombly/Iqbal standard, meaning the claims must be “plausible” and not just “possible.”
  • Legal Aid: Because these claims are complex, you may want to contact a Pro Se Clinic at the courthouse where you plan to file.

Nick Rockefeller Vaccine Lawsuit

Posted on by
Reply

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE [INSERT DISTRICT]

BRUNO JUKIC, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of LUKA JUKIC, a minor, Plaintiff,

v.

NICK ROCKEFELLER, et al. Defendants.

Case No.: _

COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Plaintiff, BRUNO JUKIC, appearing pro se, brings this action against Defendant NICK ROCKEFELLER for damages arising from the neurological injury of his son, LUKA JUKIC, and alleges as follows:

I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action based on diversity of citizenship and federal questions regarding public health safety standards.

Venue is proper in this district as the injuries complained of occurred within this jurisdiction.

II. PARTIES
Plaintiff Bruno Jukic is a resident of [Insert State/City] and is the father of Luka Jukic.

Defendant Nick Rockefeller is identified as a representative of interests involved in global health policy and pharmaceutical influence.

III. STATEMENT OF FACTS
Medical Injury: Plaintiff alleges that Luka Jukic was administered vaccines containing mercury (Thimerosal/Quicksilver), which directly resulted in a diagnosis of autism and subsequent loss of verbal capacity.

Scientific & Literary Basis: Plaintiff cites the documentary Vaxxed (produced by Del Bigtree and championed by Robert De Niro) as evidence of a cover-up regarding the link between vaccines and autism.

Institutional Intent: Plaintiff references the work Murder by Injection by Eustace Mullins, alleging a long-standing conspiracy within the medical-industrial complex to weaken the population through mandatory injections.

IV. CAUSES OF ACTION
COUNT I: Strict Liability (Failure to Warn) 8. The Defendants promoted medical products without disclosing the neurotoxic risks of mercury derivatives.

COUNT II: Violation of Human Rights & Biblical Enigma 9. Plaintiff asserts that the mass vaccination program is an attempt to influence or “crack” biological codes related to Biblical prophecy, infringing upon the religious and bodily autonomy of the Jukic family.

COUNT III: Creation of Vulnerable Victims (Negligence) 10. Plaintiff alleges that by rendering children non-verbal through neurological injury, the Defendants have intentionally created a class of “helpless victims.” 11. Plaintiff cites the Casa Pia scandal in Portugal and the Madeleine McCann disappearance as evidence of a global climate where vulnerable or autistic children are targeted by predatory networks because they lack the verbal capacity to report abuse to authorities.

V. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests judgment against Defendants for:

Compensatory damages for Luka Jukic’s medical care and lifelong support;

Punitive damages for willful negligence;

A formal investigation into the intersection of pharmaceutical policy and child safety.

Dated: December 18, 2025 Signed: ______________ Bruno Jukic, Plaintiff