Author Archives: Mike Jukic

Unknown's avatar

About Mike Jukic

During law school, Mike worked as a volunteer student lawyer for those without the means to obtain legal representation. Now an experienced litigator, Mike strives to represent his clients as efficiently and cost-effectively as possible.

Hell’s Angels Lawsuit Against Mick Jagger

Posted on by
Reply

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE [INSERT DISTRICT]

THE HELLS ANGELS MOTORCYCLE CLUB, Plaintiff,

v.

SIR MICHAEL PHILIP JAGGER, SECRET INTELLIGENCE SERVICE (MI6), AND DOES 1-20, Defendants.

Case No: _________ COMPLAINT FOR: CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MURDER, RELIGIOUS EXPLOITATION, AND VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS

I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

  1. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter based on the diverse citizenship of the parties and the claims arising under international law and civil rights statutes.
  2. Venue is proper as the underlying events related to the “Satanic sacrifice” and the actions of the “Agent Provocateurs” occurred within this jurisdiction.

II. PARTIES

  1. Plaintiff: The Hells Angels Motorcycle Club (HAMC), an organization targeted for infiltration and manipulation.
  2. Defendant Mick Jagger: An individual who, Plaintiff alleges, suffers from messianic delusions and has claimed the identity of “Lucifer the Lightbringer” as referenced in Revelation 12 and 14.
  3. Defendant MI6: The British Secret Intelligence Service, alleged to have facilitated these actions through undercover operatives.

III. STATEMENT OF FACTS

  1. The Messianic Claims: Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Jagger claimed to be the master of the Hells Angels, equating the club to the “one-third of the ANGELS of heaven” cast down in the Book of Revelation.
  2. The Altamont Incident: Plaintiff alleges that the death of a Black man at the Altamont Free Concert was not an accident or a matter of security, but a pre-meditated “Satanic sacrifice” orchestrated by Jagger and MI6 agents.
  3. Infiltration: Plaintiff alleges that MI6 used agent provocateurs to manipulate members of the HAMC into participating in or taking the blame for this event to further Jagger’s “Luciferian” delusions.

IV. CAUSES OF ACTION

COUNT I: CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MURDER Defendants Jagger and MI6 did knowingly and willfully conspire to arrange the death of a human being for the purposes of a ritual sacrifice.

COUNT II: INCITEMENT AND EXPLOITATION Defendant Jagger used his influence and “messianic delusions” to attempt to subvert the leadership of the HAMC, causing internal strife and legal jeopardy for its members.

V. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court grant the following relief:

  • Criminal Referral: That the Court refer Defendant Jagger and his MI6 handlers for prosecution for the murder of the African man.
  • Incarceration: That Defendant Jagger and the identified MI6 agents be sentenced to one hundred (100) years in a high-security facility.
  • Internal Discipline: A judicial recommendation that any member of the HAMC found to have knowingly sided with Defendant Jagger in his “Luciferian” capacity serve one (1) day in jail as a symbolic purification and legal reprimand.
  • Damages: Punitive damages for the reputational harm caused to the Hells Angels.

Dated: December 18, 2025 Respectfully Submitted,

(Your Signature)

Important Considerations

  • Statute of Limitations: Most jurisdictions require a lawsuit for personal injury or wrongful death to be filed within 2–3 years of the event. To move forward, you would likely need to argue “fraudulent concealment” (that the MI6 involvement was hidden).
  • Sovereign Immunity: MI6, as a foreign government agency, generally has immunity from being sued in U.S. courts unless specific exceptions apply.

Geronimo’s Remains Lawsuit

Posted on by
Reply

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CASE NO.: ______________

TREVOR L. CARPENTER, Chief of the Global First Nations, Plaintiff,

v.

GEORGE W. BUSH, NICK ROCKEFELLER, and YALE UNIVERSITY, Defendants.

________________________________________________/

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, DAMAGES, AND REPATRIATION OF HUMAN REMAINS

I. INTRODUCTION

  1. This is a civil action brought by Plaintiff Trevor L. Carpenter, Chief of the Global First Nations, to correct a century-old injustice: the desecration, theft, and illicit retention of the mortal remains of the Apache leader known as Geronimo (Goyaałé).
  2. The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendants, or organizations under their control or influence, are in wrongful possession of the skull, femur, and other skeletal remains of Geronimo, which were illegally disinterred from a grave at Fort Sill, Oklahoma, in approximately 1918.
  3. Plaintiff seeks the immediate repatriation of these remains under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), common law property rights, and international human rights standards regarding indigenous sovereignty.

II. PARTIES

  1. Plaintiff, TREVOR L. CARPENTER, is the Chief of the Global First Nations. He brings this suit on behalf of the lineage of Geronimo and the collective spiritual and cultural rights of First Nations people globally.
  2. Defendant, GEORGE W. BUSH, is a private citizen and former President of the United States. He is sued in his capacity as a prominent member of the Order of Skull and Bones (The Russell Trust Association), an unincorporated association operating on the campus of Yale University.
  3. Defendant, NICK ROCKEFELLER, is sued as a private citizen alleged to exercise influence and control over the assets and secrets associated with the aforementioned Order and the illicit collection of indigenous artifacts.
  4. Defendant, YALE UNIVERSITY, is a private university located in New Haven, Connecticut. The University provides the physical grounds for the “High Street Tomb” where the remains are alleged to be sequestered.

III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

  1. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (Federal Question) as this action arises under the laws of the United States, specifically the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq.
  2. Venue is proper in this district as the Defendants transact significant business here, and the political implications of the withholding of these remains affect national policy regarding indigenous rights.

IV. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

  1. Geronimo, a spiritual and military leader of the Apache, died as a prisoner of war at Fort Sill, Oklahoma, in 1909.
  2. Upon information and belief, in or around May 1918, Prescott Bush (grandfather of Defendant George W. Bush) and other members of the Skull and Bones society serving as Army volunteers at Fort Sill, conspired to dig up the grave of Geronimo.
  3. It is alleged that the skull, two femurs, and various bits of tack (bridle gear) were removed from the grave and transported to New Haven, Connecticut.
  4. These remains were placed within the “Tomb,” the windowless headquarters of the Skull and Bones society on the campus of Defendant Yale University.
  5. Evidence of this theft includes a discovered letter dated 1918 from a society member detailing the exhumation: “The skull of the worthy Geronimo the Terrible, exhumed from its tomb at Fort Sill by your club… is now safe inside the Tomb.”
  6. Defendants Bush and Rockefeller, by virtue of their membership and high status within the organization, maintain constructive possession and control over these remains.
  7. Despite repeated demands from Apache descendants and First Nations representatives, Defendants have refused to return the remains or allow for an independent DNA audit of the contents of the High Street Tomb.

V. CAUSES OF ACTION

COUNT I: VIOLATION OF NAGPRA (25 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq.) 17. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the foregoing paragraphs. 18. The remains of Geronimo constitute “Native American cultural items” and “human remains” under the Act. 19. Defendant Yale University, as a recipient of federal funds, acts as a museum/repository under the definition of the Act. 20. Defendants have failed to inventory and repatriate these remains to the lineal descendants or the appropriate First Nations authorities represented by the Plaintiff.

COUNT II: CONVERSION 21. Plaintiff has a superior right to possession of the ancestral remains. 22. Defendants have intentionally exercised dominion and control over the remains in a manner inconsistent with the Plaintiff’s rights. 23. This conversion is ongoing and continuous, as the remains are used for alleged rituals within the High Street Tomb.

COUNT III: INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS 24. The act of keeping the skull of a revered indigenous leader as a trophy or ritual object is extreme and outrageous conduct. 25. Defendants know, or should know, that such conduct causes severe emotional distress to the Plaintiff and the First Nations community.

COUNT IV: UNJUST ENRICHMENT 26. Defendants have unjustly enriched themselves by enhancing the mystique, notoriety, and recruitment power of their organization through the possession of these stolen historical remains.

VI. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Trevor L. Carpenter prays for judgment against Defendants as follows:

A. A Declaration that the remains currently held in the Skull and Bones Tomb are those of Geronimo; B. An Order requiring Defendants to immediately surrender the remains to the Plaintiff for proper burial according to traditional customs; C. An Order granting Plaintiff access to the High Street Tomb to inspect and catalog any other indigenous artifacts or remains; D. Compensatory and Punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial for the century of desecration and emotional distress; E. For costs of suit, reasonable attorney’s fees, and such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.

DATED: November 24, 2025

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Mike Jukic

Mike Jukic, Esq. Lead Counsel AXISLAW.SITE Attorney for Plaintiff Trevor L. Carpenter, Chief of the Global First Nations

Unceded Land Lawsuit

Posted on by
Reply

NOTICE OF CIVIL CLAIM: LAND BACK

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA AND IN THE COURT OF NATURAL LAW AND INDIGENOUS JURISDICTION

BETWEEN:

AUDREY SIEGL (sχɬemtəna:t), on her own behalf and as a representative of the xʷməθkʷəy̓əm (MUSQUEAM) NATION, and on behalf of all past, present, and future generations of the Coast Salish Peoples.

PLAINTIFF

AND:

HIS MAJESTY KING CHARLES III, in Right of the United Kingdom and Canada (The Crown); THE HOLY SEE (THE VATICAN) and THE ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF VANCOUVER (The Church).

DEFENDANTS

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS

  1. Since Time Immemorial: The Plaintiff and her ancestors have occupied, governed, and stewarded the lands and waters now known as Vancouver, British Columbia, specifically including but not limited to the mouth of the Fraser River, the University of British Columbia lands, and Stanley Park.
  2. Unceded Territory: The xʷməθkʷəy̓əm people have never signed a treaty with the British Crown, nor have they ever ceded, surrendered, or sold their title to the lands in question. The land remains unceded sovereign territory.
  3. The Doctrine of Discovery: The Defendants’ claim to the land relies wholly on the “Doctrine of Discovery” and the concept of Terra Nullius (nobody’s land)—racist legal fictions explicitly rejected by international human rights standards and the laws of the xʷməθkʷəy̓əm.
  4. Colonial Dispossession:
    • The Crown: Through the imposition of the Indian Act, the reserve system, and the assertion of Crown Sovereignty without consent, the Crown has forcibly displaced the Musqueam people from their winter villages and resource sites.
    • The Church: In collusion with the Crown, the Catholic Church operated Residential Schools (including St. Mary’s Mission) designed to eradicate Indigenous culture, language, and law, thereby facilitating the theft of land by removing the people from it.

II. LEGAL BASIS OF CLAIM

  1. Breach of Fiduciary Duty: The Crown has failed in its honour by granting fee simple titles to third parties on unceded lands without the consent of the rightful owners.
  2. Genocide and Cultural Destruction: The Defendants engaged in a systematic attempt to destroy the Plaintiff’s social and political structures to clear the land for settlement, constituting a crime against humanity and a violation of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP).
  3. Environmental Degradation: The Crown’s mismanagement of the land—facilitating extractive industries (pipelines, tanker traffic) in the Salish Sea—violates the Plaintiff’s inherent obligation to protect the water and land for future generations.

III. RELIEF SOUGHT

THE PLAINTIFF CLAIMS AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS AS FOLLOWS:

  1. Immediate Restitution (Land Back): A declaration that the Crown’s assertion of sovereignty over xʷməθkʷəy̓əm territory is null and void, and an order for the immediate transfer of jurisdiction of all Crown lands, including “Crown Land” and Church-held properties, back to the Musqueam Nation.
  2. Vacating of Title: An order cancelling all fee simple titles granted by the Crown on unceded lands without Musqueam consent.
  3. Reparations: Damages for the wrongful use and extraction of resources from the territory for the last 150+ years, and for the intergenerational trauma inflicted by the Residential School system.
  4. Acknowledgment: A formal, public admission by King Charles III and the Pope that the British Crown and Catholic Church have no valid legal or moral claim to the lands of British Columbia.

DATED this 24th day of November, 2025.

(Signed) sχɬemtəna:t (Audrey Siegl) Ancestral Name Holder & Land Defender