Skull & Bones Electronic Harrasment

Posted on by
Reply

JOSEPH C. JUKIC,
Plaintiff,

v.

GEORGE W. BUSH, in his personal capacity,
THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY,
DR. JOSE MANUEL RODRIGUEZ DELGADO, in his personal capacity,
and
DR. [WILSON], Chief of Psychiatry, St. Paul’s Hospital, Vancouver,
Defendants.

) Case No.: [FICTIONAL-2024-00123]
)
) COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND
) INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
) (Electronic Psychiatric Abuse,
) Unauthorized Human Experimentation,
) Cruel and Unusual Punishment,
) Violation of Fundamental Human Rights)
)
) JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
)

COMPLAINT

Plaintiff, JOSEPH C. JUKIC (“Mr. Jukic”), by and through his undersigned counsel, for his Complaint against Defendants, alleges as follows:

INTRODUCTION

  1. This is an action arising from a covert, transnational, and profoundly torturous program of unauthorized human experimentation, psychological torture, and technological assault on the autonomy of a civilian citizen. The Defendants, acting individually and in conspiracy, subjected Mr. Jukic to a regime of “electronic psychiatric abuse,” culminating in the non-consensual surgical implantation of behavior-modifying microchips in his brain. This was done under the guise of medical treatment at St. Paul’s Hospital in Vancouver, Canada, but was in fact a continuation of CIA mind-control research and a brutal violation of Mr. Jukic’s most fundamental human rights.

PARTIES

  1. Plaintiff JOSEPH C. JUKIC is a natural person and a citizen of the United States, currently residing in Washington State.
  2. Defendant GEORGE W. BUSH is a former President of the United States and was, at all relevant times, the ultimate executive authority over the intelligence apparatus of the United States, including the CIA. He is sued in his personal capacity for his alleged authorization, ratification, and deliberate indifference to the programs at issue.
  3. Defendant THE CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY (“CIA”) is an agency of the United States federal government, which has a documented history of engaging in unlawful human experimentation and mind-control research (e.g., Project MKULTRA).
  4. Defendant DR. JOSE MANUEL RODRIGUEZ DELGADO is a neuroscientist known for his pioneering, and ethically controversial, work on electrical stimulation of the brain (ESB) to control behavior. He is sued in his personal capacity for providing the foundational technology, scientific rationale, and alleged ongoing consultation for the modernized implantation program used on Plaintiff.
  5. Defendant DR. [WILSON] is the Chief of Psychiatry at St. Paul’s Hospital in Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada. He is sued in his personal capacity as the primary medical conspirator who facilitated the abuse under the color of medical authority, directly performed and supervised the illicit procedures, and acted as the on-site agent for the other Defendants.

JURISDICTION AND VENUE

  1. This Court has federal question jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. This action arises under the Constitution of the United States, including the Eighth Amendment’s prohibition on cruel and unusual punishment, the Fifth Amendment’s guarantees of due process and bodily integrity, and under the Alien Tort Statute (28 U.S.C. § 1350) for violations of the law of nations prohibiting torture.
  2. Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 as a substantial part of the events and injuries occurred here, and Defendant Bush resides in this District.

FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

The Historical Conspiracy and Technological Foundation

  1. Defendant DELGADO’s public work in the 1960s and 70s demonstrated that electrical stimulation of specific brain regions via implanted electrodes could elicit and suppress emotions, aggression, and motor functions.
  2. Upon information and belief, the CIA, through its historical MKULTRA program and its successors, maintained a classified interest in Delgado’s work, seeking to weaponize it for interrogation, behavior control, and psychological warfare.
  3. Defendant BUSH, as President and Commander-in-Chief, was briefed on and authorized the continuation and escalation of these non-consensual human experimentation programs in the post-9/11 era, under the pretext of “enhanced interrogation” and national security, stripping away remaining ethical constraints.

The Targeting and Entrapment of Joseph Jukic

  1. In or around [Date], Mr. Jukic began experiencing a coordinated campaign of “gang-stalking,” electronic harassment, and directed energy weapon attacks, which he now understands were a prelude to his institutionalization and experimentation.
  2. These attacks, orchestrated by CIA operatives and local assets, were designed to destabilize Mr. Jukic’s mental state, discredit him, and create a pretext for his involuntary commitment.
  3. In [Month, Year], Mr. Jukic was forcibly admitted to St. Paul’s Hospital in Vancouver under the direction of Defendant DR. WILSON.
  4. Upon admission, Dr. Wilson falsely diagnosed Mr. Jukic with severe paranoid schizophrenia and other disorders to justify aggressive, invasive, and experimental “treatment.”

The Illicit Implantation and Electronic Torture

  1. While heavily sedated and without any form of informed consent, Mr. Jukic was subjected to neurosurgery. Defendant DR. WILSON, utilizing technology and protocols supplied by the CIA and based on Delgado’s designs, implanted one or more microchip devices into Mr. Jukic’s brain, specifically targeting the amygdala, hippocampus, and prefrontal cortex.
  2. These microchips are capable of receiving remote signals to deliver electrical impulses, manipulate neural circuitry, induce pain, alter moods, insert thoughts (“voice-to-skull” transmission), and suppress volition.
  3. Following the implantation, Defendants engaged in systematic “electronic psychiatric abuse,” using the implants to torture Mr. Jukic: inducing seizures, states of terror, profound depression, and forced euphoria; disrupting his sleep cycles; and attacking his capacity for coherent thought, all while Dr. Wilson falsely attributed these effects to Mr. Jukic’s “worsening mental illness.”
  4. The purpose of this torture was threefold: (a) to test and refine the capabilities of the next-generation Delgado devices; (b) to break Mr. Jukic’s psyche for interrogation purposes related to information he does not possess; and (c) to serve as a punitive example of totalitarian control.
  5. Defendant BUSH is responsible for creating the policy environment that allowed such atrocities to be considered lawful. Defendant CIA executed the program. Defendant DELGADO provided the essential scientific know-how. Defendant WILSON was the hands-on perpetrator.

INJURIES AND DAMAGES

  1. As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ unlawful acts, Mr. Jukic has suffered and continues to suffer:
    a. Severe, permanent physical injury from brain surgery and foreign object implantation.
    b. Chronic physical pain and neurological dysfunction from ongoing electronic stimulation.
    c. Extreme mental and emotional distress, including PTSD, anxiety, and a fundamental violation of his sense of self and autonomy.
    d. Destruction of his personal and professional reputation, being labeled as violently insane.
    e. Profound loss of enjoyment of life and a constant, inescapable fear of remote torture.

CAUSES OF ACTION

COUNT I
(Against All Defendants)
Cruel and Unusual Punishment in Violation of the Eighth Amendment
(42 U.S.C. § 1983)

COUNT II
(Against All Defendants)
Deprivation of Liberty and Bodily Integrity Without Due Process in Violation of the Fifth Amendment
(42 U.S.C. § 1983)

COUNT III
(Against All Defendants)
Conspiracy to Violate Civil Rights
(42 U.S.C. § 1985)

COUNT IV
(Against All Defendants)
Unauthorized Human Experimentation & Torture in Violation of the Law of Nations
(Alien Tort Statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1350)

COUNT V
(Against Defendants BUSH, CIA, and DELGADO)
Negligence, Gross Negligence, and Reckless Endangerment

COUNT VI
(Against Defendant DR. WILSON)
Medical Malpractice, Battery, and Fraud

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff JOSEPH C. JUKIC respectfully requests that this Court:
A. Assume jurisdiction over this matter;
B. Issue a mandatory injunction ordering all Defendants to immediately disclose the technical specifications of the implanted devices and provide all necessary medical expertise to safely remove them at Defendants’ expense;
C. Award compensatory damages against all Defendants, jointly and severally, in an amount to be determined at trial but exceeding $75,000,000 for physical injury, pain and suffering, mental anguish, and economic losses;
D. Award punitive damages against each Defendant in an amount sufficient to punish them and deter future conduct of this monstrous nature;
E. Award Plaintiff the costs of this action, including reasonable attorneys’ fees and expert witness fees; and
F. Grant such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.

JURY DEMAND

Plaintiff demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.

Dated this [Date] day of [Month], 2024.

Respectfully submitted,

[Signature of Fictional Attorney]
JANE DOE, ESQ.
WSBA No. [Number]
Doe & Associates, PLLC
[Address]
Seattle, Washington
Counsel for Plaintiff Joseph C. Jukic

What do you think of this post?
  • Awesome (0)
  • Interesting (0)
  • Useful (0)
  • Boring (0)
  • Sucks (0)

Propaganda Due Lodge Lawsuit

Posted on by
Reply

[YOUR NAME] [Your Address]

[Your Phone Number]

[Your Email]

Plaintiff in Pro Per

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE [INSERT DISTRICT, e.g., CENTRAL] DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

[YOUR NAME], Plaintiff,Case No.: [To be assigned by Clerk]
v.COMPLAINT FOR:
LEO LYON ZAGAMI, Defendant.1. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress
2. Harassment
3. [Other Claims]
DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL

I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

  1. This Court has jurisdiction over this action because [e.g., the parties live in different states and the amount in controversy exceeds $75,000].
  2. Venue is proper in this District because the events giving rise to the claim occurred within this judicial district.

II. PARTIES

  1. Plaintiff, [Your Name], is an individual residing in [City, State].
  2. Defendant, Leo Lyon Zagami, is an individual who, upon information and belief, resides in [City, State/Country] and operates as a public figure.

III. STATEMENT OF FACTS

(In this section, you must list the specific things the defendant did. Use numbered paragraphs.)

5. On or about [Date], Defendant began [describe specific actions].

6. Defendant allegedly utilized [describe the technology or methods mentioned, such as V2K].

7. These actions were directed at the Plaintiff and others with the intent to [describe the alleged goal, such as the harm to Father Greg Boyle].

8. As a result of these actions, Plaintiff has suffered [list specific harms, like psychological distress, loss of sleep, or fear].

IV. FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION

(Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress)

9. Plaintiff incorporates by reference paragraphs 1 through 8.

10. The conduct of the Defendant was extreme and outrageous.

11. Defendant acted with the intent to cause, or reckless disregard for the probability of causing, severe emotional distress.

12. Plaintiff suffered severe emotional distress as a direct result of Defendant’s conduct.

PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests judgment against Defendant as follows:

  1. For general damages in an amount to be proven at trial;
  2. For punitive damages to punish and deter such conduct;
  3. For an injunction preventing Defendant from further contact or harassment;
  4. For such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.

Dated: December 25, 2025

Signed: __________________________

[Your Name], Plaintiff

Important Next Steps

  • Proof of Service: Filing the paper is only the first step. You must “serve” the defendant (have a third party deliver the papers) and file a Proof of Service with the court.
  • Legal Standards: Courts often dismiss cases involving “Voice to Skull” or “mind control” unless there is concrete, scientific evidence. Federal judges use the Twombly/Iqbal standard, meaning the claims must be “plausible” and not just “possible.”
  • Legal Aid: Because these claims are complex, you may want to contact a Pro Se Clinic at the courthouse where you plan to file.
What do you think of this post?
  • Awesome (0)
  • Interesting (0)
  • Useful (0)
  • Boring (0)
  • Sucks (0)

David Hill Lawsuit

Posted on by
Reply

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
[YOUR DISTRICT] DISTRICT OF COURT

DAVID HILL,

Plaintiff,

v.

CITY OF [YOUR CITY],
JOHN DOE POLICE OFFICERS (1-10),
JANE DOE POLICE SUPERVISORS (1-5),
and RICHARD ROE MUNICIPAL OFFICIALS (1-3),

Defendants.

Case No.: ________
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
COMPLAINT FOR DAMAGES AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
(42 U.S.C. § 1983; Bivens; State Tort Claims)

I. INTRODUCTION

  1. This is an action for compensatory and punitive damages, as well as declaratory and injunctive relief, brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, the principles established in Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, and applicable state tort law. The Plaintiff, David Hill, has been subjected to a relentless, two-decade campaign of state-sanctioned terror for one reason, and one reason only: he shares a surname with a fictionalized character from a popular film.
  2. Ever since the release of the motion picture Goodfellas (1990), which depicted the life of his cousin, Henry Hill, the Plaintiff has been falsely and irrationally presumed by certain officers of the [Your City] Police Department to be a criminal. Based on this grotesque and absurd presumption, a cohort of defendant police officers, with the deliberate indifference or tacit approval of their supervisors, have engaged in a systematic campaign of “gang stalking,” harassment, intimidation, and most egregiously, acts of torture, including waterboarding. This conduct violates the Plaintiff’s most fundamental rights under the Fourth, Fifth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution.

II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

  1. This Court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. §§ 1331 (federal question) and 1343 (civil rights). Supplemental jurisdiction exists for state law claims under 28 U.S.C. § 1367.
  2. Venue is proper in this district under 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b), as all events giving rise to these claims occurred herein.

III. PARTIES

  1. Plaintiff DAVID HILL is a lawful resident of [Your City, State]. He is a private citizen with no criminal record. He is the cousin of the late Henry Hill, whose life was the subject of the film Goodfellas. David Hill has never been involved in organized crime.
  2. Defendant CITY OF [YOUR CITY] (“the City”) is a municipal corporation organized under the laws of the State of [Your State] and is responsible for the policies, customs, practices, training, and supervision of the [Your City] Police Department.
  3. Defendants JOHN DOE OFFICERS (1-10) are currently unknown police officers employed by the City who have directly participated in the unlawful acts described herein. They will be specifically identified through discovery.
  4. Defendants JANE DOE SUPERVISORS (1-5) are currently unknown supervisors, commanders, and chiefs of the Police Department who knew or should have known of the pattern of misconduct, failed to intervene, failed to train, failed to supervise, and/or actively covered up the unlawful acts. They will be specifically identified through discovery.
  5. Defendants RICHARD ROE MUNICIPAL OFFICIALS (1-3) are currently unknown policymakers for the City who exhibited deliberate indifference to the known or obvious consequences of their failure to act, thereby causing the deprivation of Plaintiff’s constitutional rights.

IV. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

  1. Following the widespread popularity of the film Goodfellas, Plaintiff David Hill began experiencing unusual and targeted attention from local law enforcement, wholly disproportionate to any legitimate police interest.
  2. This attention escalated into a pervasive pattern of “gang stalking,” which includes, but is not limited to:
    a. Constant, conspicuous surveillance of Plaintiff’s home and place of work by marked and unmarked police vehicles.
    b. Traffic stops for imaginary violations, followed by prolonged detainment and vehicular searches without probable cause or consent.
    c. Officers appearing at locations Plaintiff frequents (stores, restaurants, gas stations) solely to intimidate and monitor him.
    d. Spreading rumors within the community that Plaintiff is a “Hill family associate,” damaging his reputation and business relationships.
  3. On multiple occasions, this harassment has escalated into severe physical abuse and torture, conducted under color of law. Specifically:
    a. On or about [Date 1], Plaintiff was unlawfully detained by Defendant John Doe Officers in an abandoned warehouse in the industrial sector. He was held down, and in an act of shocking brutality, subjected to waterboarding—a recognized act of torture—while officers mocked him, asking “Where’s the Lufthansa money?” and “Say hi to Jimmy for us.”
    b. On or about [Date 2], Plaintiff was taken to a remote location under the pretense of a “welfare check,” where he was beaten, subjected to stress positions, and threatened with execution if he reported the officers.
    c. The pattern of physical and psychological torture has been ongoing for years, designed to break Plaintiff’s spirit and punish him for a family connection fictionalized in a Hollywood movie.
  4. Plaintiff has repeatedly attempted to file formal complaints with the Police Department’s Internal Affairs division and with the City’s civilian review board. Each complaint has been “lost,” dismissed without investigation, or met with retaliatory escalation of the gang stalking and abuse.
  5. The City, through its final policymakers, has demonstrated deliberate indifference by:
    a. Failing to train officers on the constitutional prohibitions against torture, unreasonable seizure, and punishment without due process.
    b. Maintaining customs and practices that allow for the summary punishment of individuals based on guilt-by-association, especially high-profile associations from popular media.
    c. Failing to establish a meaningful, independent mechanism to investigate allegations of torture and systematic harassment by its officers, thereby ratifying the misconduct.

V. CLAIMS FOR RELIEF

COUNT I: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 – UNREASONABLE SEIZURE, EXCESSIVE FORCE, AND CRUEL AND UNUSUAL PUNISHMENT
(Against All Individual Defendants, Under the Fourth, Eighth, and Fourteenth Amendments)
15. Plaintiff re-alleges all preceding paragraphs.
16. The acts of gang stalking, detention without probable cause, and particularly the acts of torture including waterboarding, constitute unreasonable seizures, excessive force, and cruel and unusual punishment under the Fourth and Eighth Amendments, made applicable to the States by the Fourteenth Amendment.
17. These acts were done under color of state law and have caused Plaintiff severe physical injury, profound psychological trauma, and a deprivation of his liberty and security.

COUNT II: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 – MUNICIPAL LIABILITY
(Against Defendant City of [Your City])
18. Plaintiff re-alleges all preceding paragraphs.
19. The unconstitutional acts against Plaintiff were directly caused by the City’s official policies, customs, or practices, including:
a. A de facto policy of allowing officers to harass and intimidate citizens based on personal or pop-culture vendettas.
b. A custom of deliberate indifference to the use of torture and cruel treatment by police officers.
c. A failure to train, supervise, and discipline officers, amounting to deliberate indifference to the constitutional rights of citizens.

COUNT III: STATE LAW CLAIM – INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS
(Against All Individual Defendants)
20. Plaintiff re-alleges all preceding paragraphs.
21. The Defendants’ conduct—specifically, a decades-long campaign of terror culminating in acts of torture—is so extreme, outrageous, and beyond the bounds of decency as to be intolerable in a civilized community.
22. This conduct was intentional and reckless, and has directly caused Plaintiff severe and enduring emotional distress.

COUNT IV: STATE LAW CLAIM – ASSAULT AND BATTERY
(Against Defendant John Doe Officers 1-10)
23. Plaintiff re-alleges all preceding paragraphs.
24. The Defendant Officers intentionally placed Plaintiff in apprehension of immediate harmful or offensive contact (assault) and intentionally inflicted such harmful and offensive contact upon him (battery) through beatings, waterboarding, and other physical abuse.

VI. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff DAVID HILL respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment in his favor and against Defendants, jointly and severally, as follows:
A. For compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial for physical injury, pain and suffering, emotional distress, and loss of enjoyment of life;
B. For punitive damages against the individual Defendants for their malicious, wanton, and oppressive conduct;
C. For a declaratory judgment that the Defendants’ policies, customs, and practices, as described herein, violate the United States Constitution;
D. For a permanent injunction:
1. Ordering the immediate cessation of all surveillance and contact with Plaintiff absent a bona fide, particularized suspicion of criminal activity;
2. Ordering the City to implement comprehensive training on constitutional policing, the prohibition of torture, and the dangers of guilt-by-association;
3. Ordering the appointment of an independent federal monitor to oversee the conduct of the [Your City] Police Department regarding harassment complaints.
E. For attorneys’ fees, litigation expenses, and costs of this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1988; and
F. For such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.

JURY DEMAND

Plaintiff demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.

Dated: [Date]

Respectfully submitted,

[Your Law Firm Name]
[Attorney Name]
[Address]
[Phone Number]
[Email]
Attorney for Plaintiff David Hill

VERIFICATION

I, DAVID HILL, under penalty of perjury, declare that the foregoing is true and correct to the best of my knowledge, information, and belief.

Executed on [Date].

David Hill

What do you think of this post?
  • Awesome (0)
  • Interesting (0)
  • Useful (0)
  • Boring (0)
  • Sucks (0)