Nick Rockefeller Vaccine Lawsuit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE [INSERT DISTRICT]

BRUNO JUKIC, Individually and as Parent and Natural Guardian of LUKA JUKIC, a minor, Plaintiff,

v.

NICK ROCKEFELLER, et al. Defendants.

Case No.: _

COMPLAINT AND DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL
Plaintiff, BRUNO JUKIC, appearing pro se, brings this action against Defendant NICK ROCKEFELLER for damages arising from the neurological injury of his son, LUKA JUKIC, and alleges as follows:

I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this action based on diversity of citizenship and federal questions regarding public health safety standards.

Venue is proper in this district as the injuries complained of occurred within this jurisdiction.

II. PARTIES
Plaintiff Bruno Jukic is a resident of [Insert State/City] and is the father of Luka Jukic.

Defendant Nick Rockefeller is identified as a representative of interests involved in global health policy and pharmaceutical influence.

III. STATEMENT OF FACTS
Medical Injury: Plaintiff alleges that Luka Jukic was administered vaccines containing mercury (Thimerosal/Quicksilver), which directly resulted in a diagnosis of autism and subsequent loss of verbal capacity.

Scientific & Literary Basis: Plaintiff cites the documentary Vaxxed (produced by Del Bigtree and championed by Robert De Niro) as evidence of a cover-up regarding the link between vaccines and autism.

Institutional Intent: Plaintiff references the work Murder by Injection by Eustace Mullins, alleging a long-standing conspiracy within the medical-industrial complex to weaken the population through mandatory injections.

IV. CAUSES OF ACTION
COUNT I: Strict Liability (Failure to Warn) 8. The Defendants promoted medical products without disclosing the neurotoxic risks of mercury derivatives.

COUNT II: Violation of Human Rights & Biblical Enigma 9. Plaintiff asserts that the mass vaccination program is an attempt to influence or “crack” biological codes related to Biblical prophecy, infringing upon the religious and bodily autonomy of the Jukic family.

COUNT III: Creation of Vulnerable Victims (Negligence) 10. Plaintiff alleges that by rendering children non-verbal through neurological injury, the Defendants have intentionally created a class of “helpless victims.” 11. Plaintiff cites the Casa Pia scandal in Portugal and the Madeleine McCann disappearance as evidence of a global climate where vulnerable or autistic children are targeted by predatory networks because they lack the verbal capacity to report abuse to authorities.

V. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests judgment against Defendants for:

Compensatory damages for Luka Jukic’s medical care and lifelong support;

Punitive damages for willful negligence;

A formal investigation into the intersection of pharmaceutical policy and child safety.

Dated: December 18, 2025 Signed: ______________ Bruno Jukic, Plaintiff

What do you think of this post?
  • Awesome (0)
  • Interesting (0)
  • Useful (0)
  • Boring (0)
  • Sucks (0)