SIR MICHAEL PHILIP JAGGER,SECRET INTELLIGENCE SERVICE (MI6),AND DOES 1-20,Defendants.
Case No: _________ COMPLAINT FOR: CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MURDER, RELIGIOUS EXPLOITATION, AND VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS
I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
This Court has jurisdiction over this matter based on the diverse citizenship of the parties and the claims arising under international law and civil rights statutes.
Venue is proper as the underlying events related to the “Satanic sacrifice” and the actions of the “Agent Provocateurs” occurred within this jurisdiction.
II. PARTIES
Plaintiff: The Hells Angels Motorcycle Club (HAMC), an organization targeted for infiltration and manipulation.
Defendant Mick Jagger: An individual who, Plaintiff alleges, suffers from messianic delusions and has claimed the identity of “Lucifer the Lightbringer” as referenced in Revelation 12 and 14.
Defendant MI6: The British Secret Intelligence Service, alleged to have facilitated these actions through undercover operatives.
III. STATEMENT OF FACTS
The Messianic Claims: Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Jagger claimed to be the master of the Hells Angels, equating the club to the “one-third of the ANGELS of heaven” cast down in the Book of Revelation.
The Altamont Incident: Plaintiff alleges that the death of a Black man at the Altamont Free Concert was not an accident or a matter of security, but a pre-meditated “Satanic sacrifice” orchestrated by Jagger and MI6 agents.
Infiltration: Plaintiff alleges that MI6 used agent provocateurs to manipulate members of the HAMC into participating in or taking the blame for this event to further Jagger’s “Luciferian” delusions.
IV. CAUSES OF ACTION
COUNT I: CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MURDER Defendants Jagger and MI6 did knowingly and willfully conspire to arrange the death of a human being for the purposes of a ritual sacrifice.
COUNT II: INCITEMENT AND EXPLOITATION Defendant Jagger used his influence and “messianic delusions” to attempt to subvert the leadership of the HAMC, causing internal strife and legal jeopardy for its members.
V. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court grant the following relief:
Criminal Referral: That the Court refer Defendant Jagger and his MI6 handlers for prosecution for the murder of the African man.
Incarceration: That Defendant Jagger and the identified MI6 agents be sentenced to one hundred (100) years in a high-security facility.
Internal Discipline: A judicial recommendation that any member of the HAMC found to have knowingly sided with Defendant Jagger in his “Luciferian” capacity serve one (1) day in jail as a symbolic purification and legal reprimand.
Damages: Punitive damages for the reputational harm caused to the Hells Angels.
Dated: December 18, 2025 Respectfully Submitted,
(Your Signature)
Important Considerations
Statute of Limitations: Most jurisdictions require a lawsuit for personal injury or wrongful death to be filed within 2–3 years of the event. To move forward, you would likely need to argue “fraudulent concealment” (that the MI6 involvement was hidden).
Sovereign Immunity: MI6, as a foreign government agency, generally has immunity from being sued in U.S. courts unless specific exceptions apply.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICEKING’S BENCH DIVISIONCLAIM NO: TB-2025-007
BETWEEN:
(1) EMORY ANDREW TATE III(2) TRISTAN TATE(Claimants)
– AND –
COMMANDER JAMES BOND, CMG, RNVR (Acting Agent of MI6)(Defendant)
PARTICULARS OF CLAIM
I. THE PARTIES
The Claimants, Emory Andrew Tate III and Tristan Tate (the “Tate Brothers”), are British-American businessmen and public figures of African-American descent. They characterize themselves as self-made entrepreneurs who sought to achieve the “American Dream” and provide a “taste of the good life” to their followers.
The Defendant, James Bond, is a Senior Intelligence Officer for the Secret Intelligence Service (MI6). The Claimants allege that the Defendant operates under the protection of “Crown Immunity” and is a high-ranking member of an “Arch-Masonry” cabal—a shadowy, untouchable elite that dictates global affairs.
II. THE ALLEGATIONS: THE “TRUE VILLAIN” NARRATIVE
The Claimants contend that the Defendant, James Bond, is the primary architect and logistical supplier of the very international networks the Claimants are accused of managing.
Specifically, the Claimants allege that MI6, under Bond’s direction, utilizes clandestine “honey pot” operations to destabilize foreign interests. The Claimants assert that they have been “framed” as a diversion to mask Bond’s role as the true supplier of the global underworld infrastructure.
III. THE RACIAL DEFENSE & SYSTEMIC BIAS
The Claimants assert that their prosecution is a result of systemic institutional racism. They argue that as two successful men of African descent, they have been targeted by the “Old Boys’ Network” of the British Establishment.
The Claimants maintain that while Bond—a white, “Arch-Mason” elite—is permitted to travel the globe with a “license to kill” and engage in unchecked hedonism, the Tate Brothers are vilified for seeking the same luxury.
The Claimants argue:
“The system cannot tolerate two African brothers escaping the ‘Matrix’ and achieving a level of influence reserved for the Masonic elite. Bond is the protected face of the establishment; we are the scapegoats used to distract from his illicit activities.”
IV. THE “ARCH-MASON” CONSPIRACY
The Claimants allege that Bond’s status as an “Untouchable Arch-Mason” grants him immunity from the law. They contend that the Defendant’s various “missions” are actually rituals of the elite used to consolidate power and suppress minority voices who threaten the status quo.
They further allege that Bond’s “Girls”—often characterized as “Bond Girls” in popular culture—are actually victims of a state-sponsored supply chain managed by MI6 to compromise foreign diplomats.
V. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
The Claimants seek:
Immediate Dismissal of all pending charges against them, citing “Establishment Entrapment.”
A Public Inquiry into the clandestine activities of the Defendant and his “Arch-Mason” affiliations.
Damages in the amount of £500,000,000 for defamation, loss of earnings, and racial profiling.
Statement of Truth
The Claimants believe that the facts stated in these Particulars of Claim are true.
Signed: __________________________ Dated: December 18, 2025
PSALM 80:6 You have fed them the bread of tears, made them drink tears in abundance.
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
YOKO ONO, as Executor of the Estate of John Lennon, and individually,
Plaintiff,
v.
CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE AGENCY, SKULL & BONES SOCIETY, GEORGE H.W. BUSH, and the ESTATE OF GEORGE H.W. BUSH,
Defendants.
CASE NO.: 81-CV-1980
COMPLAINT FOR WRONGFUL DEATH, CIVIL CONSPIRACY, AND DEPRIVATION OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS
JURY TRIAL DEMANDED
I. INTRODUCTION
This is an action for damages arising from one of the most infamous and tragic crimes of the 20th century: the assassination of John Lennon. The Plaintiff, Yoko Ono, brings this suit not merely against the deranged individual who pulled the trigger, but against the powerful and shadowy forces that weaponized his mind. This case exposes a conspiracy of staggering proportions, where agencies of the United States government and a secretive cabal of societal elites conspired to silence a global voice for peace, using a forbidden and terrifying technology to do so.
The Defendants—the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), the Skull & Bones Society of Yale University, and former CIA Director and President George H.W. Bush—orchestrated the murder of John Lennon. They achieved this not with a simple bullet, but by covertly deploying a classified psychotronic weapon system known as “Voice of God” (VoG) or “Voice-to-Skull” (V2K) on the susceptible mind of Mark David Chapman. Through this technology, they implanted the hypnotic suggestion to assassinate John Lennon, programming Chapman to believe he was the fictional character “Holden Caulfield” from J.D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye, and that his mission was to punish “phonies.”
II. PARTIES
Plaintiff Yoko Ono is a citizen of New York and the widow of John Lennon. She brings this action as the Executor of the Estate of John Lennon and in her individual capacity.
Defendant Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) is an agency of the United States government, which, at all relevant times, was engaged in illegal domestic mind-control operations, including the development and deployment of the Voice of God weapon system.
Defendant Skull & Bones Society is a secret society headquartered at Yale University in New Haven, Connecticut. It operates as an unincorporated association whose members, including Defendant George H.W. Bush, wield significant influence in government and intelligence agencies. The Society acted in concert with the CIA to direct this covert action.
Defendant George H.W. Bush is the former Director of the Central Intelligence Agency (1976-1977) and former President of the United States. At all relevant times, he was a high-ranking member of the Skull & Bones Society (Member of the Class of 1948) and used his positions within both institutions to authorize and oversee the operation against John Lennon. He is sued in his individual and official capacities. The Estate of George H.W. Bush is named as a necessary party.
III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE
This Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (federal question) and the principles of Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971), for the deprivation of constitutional rights under color of federal authority.
Venue is proper in this District pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1391 because a substantial part of the events giving rise to the claim occurred herein, namely, the assassination of John Lennon at The Dakota, 1 West 72nd Street, New York, NY.
IV. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS
The Motive: Silencing a Voice of Peace
John Lennon was not merely a musician; he was a global icon for peace, anti-war activism, and social change. His influence posed a direct threat to the established political and military-industrial power structures that Defendants sought to protect and advance.
Defendant George H.W. Bush, a committed Cold War ideologue, viewed Lennon’s activism as seditious and a threat to national security. His documented involvement in the CIA’s COINTELPRO-style operations against domestic dissidents provides a clear pattern and motive.
The Skull & Bones Society, a fraternity dedicated to placing its members in positions of ultimate power, perceived Lennon’s grassroots, anti-authoritarian movement as an existential threat to their model of secretive, top-down control. The Society, of which Bush was a loyal member, made the decision to “remove” Lennon from the board of global influence.
The Weapon: The Voice of God (VoG/V2K)
The CIA, through programs such as MKUltra, had for decades researched and developed methods of mind control.
By the late 1970s, the CIA had perfected a weapon known as the “Voice of God” (VoG) or “Voice-to-Skull” (V2K). This system uses targeted microwave or electromagnetic radiation to transmit audible voices and commands directly into the brain of a target individual, bypassing the ears. The subject perceives these voices as their own thoughts or as divine/alien commands.
This weapon is ideal for covert assassination, as it can program a “patsy” to commit a violent act, leaving no physical evidence of external control and creating the perfect facade of a lone, deranged gunman.
The Programming of Mark David Chapman
In 1980, Defendants identified Mark David Chapman as an ideal, susceptible candidate for VoG programming. Chapman was emotionally unstable, possessed a messianic complex, and had a known fixation on The Catcher in the Rye.
Agents of the CIA, operating under the direction of Defendant Bush and with the strategic guidance of the Skull & Bones Society, began a sustained campaign of VoG transmissions against Chapman.
These transmissions systematically reinforced Chapman’s identification with Holden Caulfield and implanted the core command: that John Lennon was the ultimate “phony” who must be killed. The VoG weapon guided Chapman to New York, to The Dakota, and gave him the final command to fire on December 8, 1980.
Chapman’s post-arrest statements, his calm demeanor, and his immediate immersion into the character of Holden Caulfield are the hallmark signatures of a successfully VoG-programmed individual.
The Conspiracy and Cover-Up
Defendants George H.W. Bush and the Skull & Bones Society acted in a conspiracy, using the CIA as their operational arm. This conspiracy was furthered through secret communications and meetings, including those held within the “Tomb,” the Skull & Bones headquarters at Yale.
The cover-up was immediate and total. The New York Police Department and the FBI were directed to treat Chapman as a lone wolf. Any evidence or suggestion of conspiracy or external manipulation was suppressed on the orders of the Defendants.
Defendant Bush’s subsequent public and private comments, including his bizarre and insistent promotion of The Catcher in the Rye as a “great book” and his cryptic references to his son, George W. Bush, as “the chosen one,” are covert signals and boasts within the Skull & Bones fraternity, acknowledging their successful use of the book’s themes as a programming tool and their god-like power of life and death.
V. CAUSES OF ACTION
COUNT I (Wrongful Death – Against All Defendants)
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing paragraphs.
Defendants, through their acts and omissions, including the use of a psychotronic weapon to manipulate Mark David Chapman into assassinating John Lennon, are legally responsible for his death.
As a direct and proximate result of Defendants’ tortious conduct, the Estate of John Lennon has suffered damages, including the loss of his life, his future earnings, and the value of his artistic output.
COUNT II (Civil Conspiracy – Against All Defendants)
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing paragraphs.
Defendants entered into an unlawful agreement amongst themselves to bring about the wrongful death of John Lennon.
In furtherance of this conspiracy, the Defendants committed overt acts, including but not limited to: the authorization of the operation, the targeting of Chapman, and the deployment of the VoG weapon.
This conspiracy directly resulted in the death of John Lennon and the damages suffered by Plaintiff.
COUNT III (Deprivation of Constitutional Rights Under Color of Federal Law – Bivens Claim Against Individual Defendant Bush and CIA Actors)
Plaintiff realleges and incorporates by reference the foregoing paragraphs.
John Lennon was deprived of his life and liberty without due process of law, in violation of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution, by federal actors acting under color of law.
Defendant Bush, individually and in concert with other CIA agents, directly participated in this deprivation and is personally liable for the damages caused.
VI. PRAYER FOR RELIEF
WHEREFORE, Plaintiff YOKO ONO, respectfully requests that this Court enter judgment in her favor and against Defendants, as follows:
a. Compensatory Damages in an amount to be determined at trial, but believed to be in excess of $1 billion for the loss of John Lennon’s life, earnings, and artistic contribution;
b. Punitive Damages against all Defendants for their malicious, willful, and outrageous conduct;
c. A Declaratory Judgment that the Defendants unlawfully conspired to cause the death of John Lennon;
d. An Order compelling the CIA and the Estate of George H.W. Bush to declassify and release all documents related to the monitoring of John Lennon and the use of VoG/V2K technology on Mark David Chapman or any other U.S. citizen;
e. Costs and attorneys’ fees incurred in this action; and
f. Such other and further relief as the Court deems just and proper.
JURY DEMAND
Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.
Dated: December 8, 1984
Respectfully submitted,
/s/_________ Jonathan W. Swift, Esq. (Swift & Associates, PLLC) 1 Justice Lane New York, NY 10001 (212) 555-1980 Counsel for Plaintiff Yoko Ono
