Tag Archives: axis law

East Hastings Mental Health

Posted on by
Reply

Setting: A simple podcast setup or a candid video recording. The vibe is intense, serious, and focused on exposing “hidden truths” about the Vancouver Downtown Eastside (DTES).

Mike Jukic: We’re looking at East Hastings today, Joe. Everyone’s talking about the “mental health crisis.” The city, the province—they all have these task forces. They look at the people on the street and they see broken minds. But what do we see?

Joe Jukic: We see a broken system, Mike. We see a spiritual and biological war. You know, I was reading Isaiah 30:20 this morning. It hit me like a ton of bricks. “Although the Lord gives you the bread of adversity and the water of affliction, your teachers will be hidden no more; with your own eyes you will see them.”

Mike Jukic: “Bread of adversity.” That’s not a metaphor anymore, is it?

Joe Jukic: It’s literal. It is absolutely literal. Look at what we are feeding the poor. What is the “bread of adversity” today? It’s conventional wheat sprayed with glyphosate. It’s a neurotoxin. We are handing out sandwiches on the street corner that are destroying the gut lining, and the gut is the second brain. If you poison the gut, you poison the mind.

Mike Jukic: And the “water of affliction”?

Joe Jukic: Tap water. Full of chlorine, fluoride, heavy metals, pharmaceutical runoff. You take a human being, you strip them of their assets, and then you feed them poison. And then you stand back and say, “Oh, look, they’re mentally ill.”

Mike Jukic: Exactly. And that’s the deception. I look at that community—half of those people aren’t mentally ill in the clinical sense. They are poverty-stricken. They are refugees of an economic war.

Joe Jukic: The diagnostic manual is wrong. You want to see true insanity? Don’t look at the tent in Oppenheimer Park. Look at the towers downtown. Look at the bankers.

Mike Jukic: That’s where the delusion is. The belief that you can create money out of nothing, attach debt to it, and enslave a population mathematically—that is the sickness. The banker creating currency as debt is the psychopath. The guy on the street is just the collateral damage of that psychosis.

Joe Jukic: So, what’s the fix? It’s not more pills. It’s not another government facility with fluorescent lights.

Mike Jukic: It’s sovereignty. Give them their ground back.

Joe Jukic: Right. Let them have the tent city at Oppenheimer Park. Stop bulldozing their homes. But here’s the twist—change the aid.

Mike Jukic: Instead of social workers managing behaviors…

Joe Jukic: …Have the mental health workers act as delivery drivers. Don’t bring them drugs. Bring them Silver Hills sprouted grain bread. Bring them organic, living food. Bring them triple-filtered, clean water.

Mike Jukic: You flush the glyphosate out. You clean the blood. You stop the “bread of adversity.”

Joe Jukic: Exactly. You treat the body with respect, you stop the chemical assault, and suddenly, the “mental illness” evaporates. Their teachers will be hidden no more. They’ll see clearly for the first time in years.

Mike Jukic: Simple. Biological reality first. Economic reality second. The rest is just noise.

What do you think of this post?
  • Awesome (0)
  • Interesting (0)
  • Useful (0)
  • Boring (0)
  • Sucks (0)

Geronimo’s Remains Lawsuit

Posted on by
Reply

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CASE NO.: ______________

TREVOR L. CARPENTER, Chief of the Global First Nations, Plaintiff,

v.

GEORGE W. BUSH, NICK ROCKEFELLER, and YALE UNIVERSITY, Defendants.

________________________________________________/

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, DAMAGES, AND REPATRIATION OF HUMAN REMAINS

I. INTRODUCTION

  1. This is a civil action brought by Plaintiff Trevor L. Carpenter, Chief of the Global First Nations, to correct a century-old injustice: the desecration, theft, and illicit retention of the mortal remains of the Apache leader known as Geronimo (Goyaałé).
  2. The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendants, or organizations under their control or influence, are in wrongful possession of the skull, femur, and other skeletal remains of Geronimo, which were illegally disinterred from a grave at Fort Sill, Oklahoma, in approximately 1918.
  3. Plaintiff seeks the immediate repatriation of these remains under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), common law property rights, and international human rights standards regarding indigenous sovereignty.

II. PARTIES

  1. Plaintiff, TREVOR L. CARPENTER, is the Chief of the Global First Nations. He brings this suit on behalf of the lineage of Geronimo and the collective spiritual and cultural rights of First Nations people globally.
  2. Defendant, GEORGE W. BUSH, is a private citizen and former President of the United States. He is sued in his capacity as a prominent member of the Order of Skull and Bones (The Russell Trust Association), an unincorporated association operating on the campus of Yale University.
  3. Defendant, NICK ROCKEFELLER, is sued as a private citizen alleged to exercise influence and control over the assets and secrets associated with the aforementioned Order and the illicit collection of indigenous artifacts.
  4. Defendant, YALE UNIVERSITY, is a private university located in New Haven, Connecticut. The University provides the physical grounds for the “High Street Tomb” where the remains are alleged to be sequestered.

III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

  1. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (Federal Question) as this action arises under the laws of the United States, specifically the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq.
  2. Venue is proper in this district as the Defendants transact significant business here, and the political implications of the withholding of these remains affect national policy regarding indigenous rights.

IV. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

  1. Geronimo, a spiritual and military leader of the Apache, died as a prisoner of war at Fort Sill, Oklahoma, in 1909.
  2. Upon information and belief, in or around May 1918, Prescott Bush (grandfather of Defendant George W. Bush) and other members of the Skull and Bones society serving as Army volunteers at Fort Sill, conspired to dig up the grave of Geronimo.
  3. It is alleged that the skull, two femurs, and various bits of tack (bridle gear) were removed from the grave and transported to New Haven, Connecticut.
  4. These remains were placed within the “Tomb,” the windowless headquarters of the Skull and Bones society on the campus of Defendant Yale University.
  5. Evidence of this theft includes a discovered letter dated 1918 from a society member detailing the exhumation: “The skull of the worthy Geronimo the Terrible, exhumed from its tomb at Fort Sill by your club… is now safe inside the Tomb.”
  6. Defendants Bush and Rockefeller, by virtue of their membership and high status within the organization, maintain constructive possession and control over these remains.
  7. Despite repeated demands from Apache descendants and First Nations representatives, Defendants have refused to return the remains or allow for an independent DNA audit of the contents of the High Street Tomb.

V. CAUSES OF ACTION

COUNT I: VIOLATION OF NAGPRA (25 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq.) 17. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the foregoing paragraphs. 18. The remains of Geronimo constitute “Native American cultural items” and “human remains” under the Act. 19. Defendant Yale University, as a recipient of federal funds, acts as a museum/repository under the definition of the Act. 20. Defendants have failed to inventory and repatriate these remains to the lineal descendants or the appropriate First Nations authorities represented by the Plaintiff.

COUNT II: CONVERSION 21. Plaintiff has a superior right to possession of the ancestral remains. 22. Defendants have intentionally exercised dominion and control over the remains in a manner inconsistent with the Plaintiff’s rights. 23. This conversion is ongoing and continuous, as the remains are used for alleged rituals within the High Street Tomb.

COUNT III: INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS 24. The act of keeping the skull of a revered indigenous leader as a trophy or ritual object is extreme and outrageous conduct. 25. Defendants know, or should know, that such conduct causes severe emotional distress to the Plaintiff and the First Nations community.

COUNT IV: UNJUST ENRICHMENT 26. Defendants have unjustly enriched themselves by enhancing the mystique, notoriety, and recruitment power of their organization through the possession of these stolen historical remains.

VI. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Trevor L. Carpenter prays for judgment against Defendants as follows:

A. A Declaration that the remains currently held in the Skull and Bones Tomb are those of Geronimo; B. An Order requiring Defendants to immediately surrender the remains to the Plaintiff for proper burial according to traditional customs; C. An Order granting Plaintiff access to the High Street Tomb to inspect and catalog any other indigenous artifacts or remains; D. Compensatory and Punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial for the century of desecration and emotional distress; E. For costs of suit, reasonable attorney’s fees, and such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.

DATED: November 24, 2025

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Mike Jukic

Mike Jukic, Esq. Lead Counsel AXISLAW.SITE Attorney for Plaintiff Trevor L. Carpenter, Chief of the Global First Nations

What do you think of this post?
  • Awesome (0)
  • Interesting (0)
  • Useful (0)
  • Boring (0)
  • Sucks (0)

Unceded Land Lawsuit

Posted on by
Reply

NOTICE OF CIVIL CLAIM: LAND BACK

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA AND IN THE COURT OF NATURAL LAW AND INDIGENOUS JURISDICTION

BETWEEN:

AUDREY SIEGL (sχɬemtəna:t), on her own behalf and as a representative of the xʷməθkʷəy̓əm (MUSQUEAM) NATION, and on behalf of all past, present, and future generations of the Coast Salish Peoples.

PLAINTIFF

AND:

HIS MAJESTY KING CHARLES III, in Right of the United Kingdom and Canada (The Crown); THE HOLY SEE (THE VATICAN) and THE ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF VANCOUVER (The Church).

DEFENDANTS

I. STATEMENT OF FACTS

  1. Since Time Immemorial: The Plaintiff and her ancestors have occupied, governed, and stewarded the lands and waters now known as Vancouver, British Columbia, specifically including but not limited to the mouth of the Fraser River, the University of British Columbia lands, and Stanley Park.
  2. Unceded Territory: The xʷməθkʷəy̓əm people have never signed a treaty with the British Crown, nor have they ever ceded, surrendered, or sold their title to the lands in question. The land remains unceded sovereign territory.
  3. The Doctrine of Discovery: The Defendants’ claim to the land relies wholly on the “Doctrine of Discovery” and the concept of Terra Nullius (nobody’s land)—racist legal fictions explicitly rejected by international human rights standards and the laws of the xʷməθkʷəy̓əm.
  4. Colonial Dispossession:
    • The Crown: Through the imposition of the Indian Act, the reserve system, and the assertion of Crown Sovereignty without consent, the Crown has forcibly displaced the Musqueam people from their winter villages and resource sites.
    • The Church: In collusion with the Crown, the Catholic Church operated Residential Schools (including St. Mary’s Mission) designed to eradicate Indigenous culture, language, and law, thereby facilitating the theft of land by removing the people from it.

II. LEGAL BASIS OF CLAIM

  1. Breach of Fiduciary Duty: The Crown has failed in its honour by granting fee simple titles to third parties on unceded lands without the consent of the rightful owners.
  2. Genocide and Cultural Destruction: The Defendants engaged in a systematic attempt to destroy the Plaintiff’s social and political structures to clear the land for settlement, constituting a crime against humanity and a violation of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP).
  3. Environmental Degradation: The Crown’s mismanagement of the land—facilitating extractive industries (pipelines, tanker traffic) in the Salish Sea—violates the Plaintiff’s inherent obligation to protect the water and land for future generations.

III. RELIEF SOUGHT

THE PLAINTIFF CLAIMS AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS AS FOLLOWS:

  1. Immediate Restitution (Land Back): A declaration that the Crown’s assertion of sovereignty over xʷməθkʷəy̓əm territory is null and void, and an order for the immediate transfer of jurisdiction of all Crown lands, including “Crown Land” and Church-held properties, back to the Musqueam Nation.
  2. Vacating of Title: An order cancelling all fee simple titles granted by the Crown on unceded lands without Musqueam consent.
  3. Reparations: Damages for the wrongful use and extraction of resources from the territory for the last 150+ years, and for the intergenerational trauma inflicted by the Residential School system.
  4. Acknowledgment: A formal, public admission by King Charles III and the Pope that the British Crown and Catholic Church have no valid legal or moral claim to the lands of British Columbia.

DATED this 24th day of November, 2025.

(Signed) sχɬemtəna:t (Audrey Siegl) Ancestral Name Holder & Land Defender

What do you think of this post?
  • Awesome (0)
  • Interesting (0)
  • Useful (0)
  • Boring (0)
  • Sucks (0)