Unceded Land Lawsuit

NOTICE OF CIVIL CLAIM: LAND BACK

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUMBIA AND IN THE COURT OF NATURAL LAW AND INDIGENOUS JURISDICTION

BETWEEN:

AUDREY SIEGL (sχɬemtəna:t), on her own behalf and as a representative of the xʷməθkʷəy̓əm (MUSQUEAM) NATION, and on behalf of all past, present, and future generations of the Coast Salish Peoples.

PLAINTIFF

AND:

HIS MAJESTY KING CHARLES III, in Right of the United Kingdom and Canada (The Crown); THE HOLY SEE (THE VATICAN) and THE ROMAN CATHOLIC ARCHDIOCESE OF VANCOUVER (The Church).

DEFENDANTS


I. STATEMENT OF FACTS

  1. Since Time Immemorial: The Plaintiff and her ancestors have occupied, governed, and stewarded the lands and waters now known as Vancouver, British Columbia, specifically including but not limited to the mouth of the Fraser River, the University of British Columbia lands, and Stanley Park.
  2. Unceded Territory: The xʷməθkʷəy̓əm people have never signed a treaty with the British Crown, nor have they ever ceded, surrendered, or sold their title to the lands in question. The land remains unceded sovereign territory.
  3. The Doctrine of Discovery: The Defendants’ claim to the land relies wholly on the “Doctrine of Discovery” and the concept of Terra Nullius (nobody’s land)—racist legal fictions explicitly rejected by international human rights standards and the laws of the xʷməθkʷəy̓əm.
  4. Colonial Dispossession:
    • The Crown: Through the imposition of the Indian Act, the reserve system, and the assertion of Crown Sovereignty without consent, the Crown has forcibly displaced the Musqueam people from their winter villages and resource sites.
    • The Church: In collusion with the Crown, the Catholic Church operated Residential Schools (including St. Mary’s Mission) designed to eradicate Indigenous culture, language, and law, thereby facilitating the theft of land by removing the people from it.

II. LEGAL BASIS OF CLAIM

  1. Breach of Fiduciary Duty: The Crown has failed in its honour by granting fee simple titles to third parties on unceded lands without the consent of the rightful owners.
  2. Genocide and Cultural Destruction: The Defendants engaged in a systematic attempt to destroy the Plaintiff’s social and political structures to clear the land for settlement, constituting a crime against humanity and a violation of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples (UNDRIP).
  3. Environmental Degradation: The Crown’s mismanagement of the land—facilitating extractive industries (pipelines, tanker traffic) in the Salish Sea—violates the Plaintiff’s inherent obligation to protect the water and land for future generations.

III. RELIEF SOUGHT

THE PLAINTIFF CLAIMS AGAINST THE DEFENDANTS AS FOLLOWS:

  1. Immediate Restitution (Land Back): A declaration that the Crown’s assertion of sovereignty over xʷməθkʷəy̓əm territory is null and void, and an order for the immediate transfer of jurisdiction of all Crown lands, including “Crown Land” and Church-held properties, back to the Musqueam Nation.
  2. Vacating of Title: An order cancelling all fee simple titles granted by the Crown on unceded lands without Musqueam consent.
  3. Reparations: Damages for the wrongful use and extraction of resources from the territory for the last 150+ years, and for the intergenerational trauma inflicted by the Residential School system.
  4. Acknowledgment: A formal, public admission by King Charles III and the Pope that the British Crown and Catholic Church have no valid legal or moral claim to the lands of British Columbia.

DATED this 24th day of November, 2025.

(Signed) sχɬemtəna:t (Audrey Siegl) Ancestral Name Holder & Land Defender

What do you think of this post?
  • Awesome (0)
  • Interesting (0)
  • Useful (0)
  • Boring (0)
  • Sucks (0)

Nelly Furtado Against Steven Spielberg

No heat, no electricity, no lawyer, and a life threatening disease

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – CENTRAL DISTRICT

NELLY FURTADO, Plaintiff, v.

STEVEN SPIELBERG, Defendant.

CASE NO: 25CV001234

COMPLAINT FOR:

  1. Breach of Contract
  2. Promissory Estoppel
  3. Fraudulent Misrepresentation
  4. Negligent Infliction of Emotional Distress

I. INTRODUCTION

  1. This action arises out of a series of broken promises made by the Defendant, Steven Spielberg, to the Plaintiff, Nelly Furtado.
  2. Plaintiff, who suffers from the life-limiting condition Cystic Fibrosis, alleges that Defendant leveraged his status as a global visionary to promise a “messianic” or miraculous cure for her ailment.
  3. Despite these grand assurances, Defendant failed to provide any such cure, instead relegating Plaintiff to a regimen of “junk medicine” costing in excess of $60,000 USD per annum, which has provided no therapeutic benefit.

II. PARTIES

  1. Plaintiff Nelly Furtado is an individual residing in the Province of Ontario, Canada, and/or the State of California.
  2. Defendant Steven Spielberg is a resident of Los Angeles County, California, known globally as a film director and producer.

III. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

  1. In or around 2022, Defendant entered into a series of discussions with Plaintiff regarding her health.
  2. Defendant explicitly represented that he possessed the resources or connections to provide a “Messiah”—a revolutionary, near-instantaneous cure for Cystic Fibrosis that bypassed traditional medical science.
  3. Relying on Defendant’s reputation for making the “impossible” happen on screen, Plaintiff ceased seeking alternative legitimate gene therapies, believing Defendant’s promise to be sincere.
  4. Rather than delivering the promised miracle, Defendant directed Plaintiff toward a series of unproven, experimental pharmaceutical “junk drugs.”
  5. These treatments cost the Plaintiff approximately $5,000 per month, totaling $60,000 annually, and have resulted in no improvement to her lung function or overall health.

IV. CAUSES OF ACTION

FIRST CAUSE OF ACTION: Promissory Estoppel 11. Defendant made a clear and unambiguous promise to provide a “messianic” cure. 12. Plaintiff reasonably and foreseeably relied on this promise to her detriment, neglecting other medical avenues. 13. Injustice can only be avoided by an enforcement of the promise or compensatory damages.

SECOND CAUSE OF ACTION: Fraudulent Misrepresentation 14. Defendant knew, or should have known, that he did not possess a “messiah” or a cure for Cystic Fibrosis. 15. The representations were made to induce Plaintiff to rely on Defendant’s influence and utilize specific high-cost medications.


V. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests judgment against Defendant as follows:

  • Compensatory Damages in the amount of $60,000 per year for medical expenses;
  • General Damages for emotional distress and physical decline;
  • Punitive Damages to deter such reckless promises in the future;
  • Such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.

Dated: December 18, 2025

Respectfully Submitted, Direct Signature (Fictional)

ADDENDUM: SECOND CIVIL COMPLAINT

COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES – CENTRAL DISTRICT

NELLY FURTADO, Plaintiff, v.

STEVEN SPIELBERG; DR. [FICTIONAL NAME], M.D.; [HOSPITAL NAME]; and DOES 1-50, Defendants.

CASE NO: 25CV001235

COMPLAINT FOR:

  1. False Imprisonment
  2. Civil Conspiracy
  3. Medical Malpractice (Psychiatric)
  4. Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress (IIED)

VI. ADDITIONAL FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

  1. Plaintiff alleges that when she questioned the efficacy of the $60,000-per-year “junk medicine” previously mentioned, Defendant Spielberg orchestrated a “medical intervention” under the guise of concern.
  2. On or about [Date], Plaintiff was forcibly detained and admitted to a private psychiatric facility by individuals acting as agents of the Defendant, specifically a network of psychiatrists personally and professionally affiliated with the Defendant.
  3. During this confinement, Plaintiff was subjected to “gaslighting”—a systematic psychological manipulation intended to make her doubt her own memory of the “Messiah” promise and the reality of her physical symptoms.
  4. Plaintiff was held against her will for a period of [Duration], during which she suffered extreme psychological trauma, loss of liberty, and damage to her professional reputation.

VII. CAUSES OF ACTION

THIRD CAUSE OF ACTION: False Imprisonment 20. Defendants intentionally and unlawfully restrained Plaintiff’s personal liberty through the use of psychiatric holds without valid medical grounds. 21. This restraint was non-consensual and conducted for the purpose of silencing Plaintiff regarding Defendant Spielberg’s failed promises.

FOURTH CAUSE OF ACTION: Civil Conspiracy 22. Defendant Spielberg and his medical associates entered into an agreement to commit the wrongful acts of gaslighting and unlawful detention. 23. The common purpose was to protect Defendant Spielberg’s public image from the fallout of his “Messiah” medical claims.


VIII. SPECIAL PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff requests judgment against Defendants as follows:

  1. Equitable Distribution of Assets: Plaintiff demands a transfer of 50% of the total valuation of the Spielberg-affiliated corporate entities, including but not limited to interests in DreamWorks SKG, as compensation for the total loss of personal autonomy and the calculated destruction of her mental health.
  2. Declaratory Relief: A court order declaring the psychiatric diagnosis used for her imprisonment to be null, void, and fraudulent.
  3. Punitive Damages: In an amount sufficient to punish the Defendants for the use of corporate power to subvert individual civil rights.

Dated: December 18, 2025

Respectfully Submitted, Direct Signature (Fictional)

Under California law, entrapment refers to a situation where a “normally law abiding person” is induced to commit a crime that he/she otherwise would not have committed. Entrapment only applies to overbearing official conduct, seen in the form of pressure, harassment, fraud, flattery, or threats.

CONCLUSION

her contract says they promised her a cure for cystic fibrosis with an indian doctor. Dreamworks never delivered on that promise, neither did Universal (Bronfman crime family)

Lisa Furtado’s book is our evidence. There was also an attempted rape before the Mumbai Mahdi Jihad terrorist attacks.

What do you think of this post?
  • Awesome (0)
  • Interesting (0)
  • Useful (0)
  • Boring (0)
  • Sucks (0)