Tag Archives: mike jukic

Hell’s Angels Lawsuit Against Mick Jagger

Posted on by
Reply

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE [INSERT DISTRICT]

THE HELLS ANGELS MOTORCYCLE CLUB, Plaintiff,

v.

SIR MICHAEL PHILIP JAGGER, SECRET INTELLIGENCE SERVICE (MI6), AND DOES 1-20, Defendants.

Case No: _________ COMPLAINT FOR: CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MURDER, RELIGIOUS EXPLOITATION, AND VIOLATION OF CIVIL RIGHTS

I. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

  1. This Court has jurisdiction over this matter based on the diverse citizenship of the parties and the claims arising under international law and civil rights statutes.
  2. Venue is proper as the underlying events related to the “Satanic sacrifice” and the actions of the “Agent Provocateurs” occurred within this jurisdiction.

II. PARTIES

  1. Plaintiff: The Hells Angels Motorcycle Club (HAMC), an organization targeted for infiltration and manipulation.
  2. Defendant Mick Jagger: An individual who, Plaintiff alleges, suffers from messianic delusions and has claimed the identity of “Lucifer the Lightbringer” as referenced in Revelation 12 and 14.
  3. Defendant MI6: The British Secret Intelligence Service, alleged to have facilitated these actions through undercover operatives.

III. STATEMENT OF FACTS

  1. The Messianic Claims: Plaintiff alleges that Defendant Jagger claimed to be the master of the Hells Angels, equating the club to the “one-third of the ANGELS of heaven” cast down in the Book of Revelation.
  2. The Altamont Incident: Plaintiff alleges that the death of a Black man at the Altamont Free Concert was not an accident or a matter of security, but a pre-meditated “Satanic sacrifice” orchestrated by Jagger and MI6 agents.
  3. Infiltration: Plaintiff alleges that MI6 used agent provocateurs to manipulate members of the HAMC into participating in or taking the blame for this event to further Jagger’s “Luciferian” delusions.

IV. CAUSES OF ACTION

COUNT I: CONSPIRACY TO COMMIT MURDER Defendants Jagger and MI6 did knowingly and willfully conspire to arrange the death of a human being for the purposes of a ritual sacrifice.

COUNT II: INCITEMENT AND EXPLOITATION Defendant Jagger used his influence and “messianic delusions” to attempt to subvert the leadership of the HAMC, causing internal strife and legal jeopardy for its members.

V. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

Plaintiff respectfully requests that the Court grant the following relief:

  • Criminal Referral: That the Court refer Defendant Jagger and his MI6 handlers for prosecution for the murder of the African man.
  • Incarceration: That Defendant Jagger and the identified MI6 agents be sentenced to one hundred (100) years in a high-security facility.
  • Internal Discipline: A judicial recommendation that any member of the HAMC found to have knowingly sided with Defendant Jagger in his “Luciferian” capacity serve one (1) day in jail as a symbolic purification and legal reprimand.
  • Damages: Punitive damages for the reputational harm caused to the Hells Angels.

Dated: December 18, 2025 Respectfully Submitted,

(Your Signature)

Important Considerations

  • Statute of Limitations: Most jurisdictions require a lawsuit for personal injury or wrongful death to be filed within 2–3 years of the event. To move forward, you would likely need to argue “fraudulent concealment” (that the MI6 involvement was hidden).
  • Sovereign Immunity: MI6, as a foreign government agency, generally has immunity from being sued in U.S. courts unless specific exceptions apply.
What do you think of this post?
  • Awesome (0)
  • Interesting (0)
  • Useful (0)
  • Boring (0)
  • Sucks (0)

Geronimo’s Remains Lawsuit

Posted on by
Reply

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

CASE NO.: ______________

TREVOR L. CARPENTER, Chief of the Global First Nations, Plaintiff,

v.

GEORGE W. BUSH, NICK ROCKEFELLER, and YALE UNIVERSITY, Defendants.

________________________________________________/

COMPLAINT FOR DECLARATORY AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF, DAMAGES, AND REPATRIATION OF HUMAN REMAINS

I. INTRODUCTION

  1. This is a civil action brought by Plaintiff Trevor L. Carpenter, Chief of the Global First Nations, to correct a century-old injustice: the desecration, theft, and illicit retention of the mortal remains of the Apache leader known as Geronimo (Goyaałé).
  2. The Plaintiff alleges that the Defendants, or organizations under their control or influence, are in wrongful possession of the skull, femur, and other skeletal remains of Geronimo, which were illegally disinterred from a grave at Fort Sill, Oklahoma, in approximately 1918.
  3. Plaintiff seeks the immediate repatriation of these remains under the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), common law property rights, and international human rights standards regarding indigenous sovereignty.

II. PARTIES

  1. Plaintiff, TREVOR L. CARPENTER, is the Chief of the Global First Nations. He brings this suit on behalf of the lineage of Geronimo and the collective spiritual and cultural rights of First Nations people globally.
  2. Defendant, GEORGE W. BUSH, is a private citizen and former President of the United States. He is sued in his capacity as a prominent member of the Order of Skull and Bones (The Russell Trust Association), an unincorporated association operating on the campus of Yale University.
  3. Defendant, NICK ROCKEFELLER, is sued as a private citizen alleged to exercise influence and control over the assets and secrets associated with the aforementioned Order and the illicit collection of indigenous artifacts.
  4. Defendant, YALE UNIVERSITY, is a private university located in New Haven, Connecticut. The University provides the physical grounds for the “High Street Tomb” where the remains are alleged to be sequestered.

III. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

  1. This Court has subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (Federal Question) as this action arises under the laws of the United States, specifically the Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act (NAGPRA), 25 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq.
  2. Venue is proper in this district as the Defendants transact significant business here, and the political implications of the withholding of these remains affect national policy regarding indigenous rights.

IV. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

  1. Geronimo, a spiritual and military leader of the Apache, died as a prisoner of war at Fort Sill, Oklahoma, in 1909.
  2. Upon information and belief, in or around May 1918, Prescott Bush (grandfather of Defendant George W. Bush) and other members of the Skull and Bones society serving as Army volunteers at Fort Sill, conspired to dig up the grave of Geronimo.
  3. It is alleged that the skull, two femurs, and various bits of tack (bridle gear) were removed from the grave and transported to New Haven, Connecticut.
  4. These remains were placed within the “Tomb,” the windowless headquarters of the Skull and Bones society on the campus of Defendant Yale University.
  5. Evidence of this theft includes a discovered letter dated 1918 from a society member detailing the exhumation: “The skull of the worthy Geronimo the Terrible, exhumed from its tomb at Fort Sill by your club… is now safe inside the Tomb.”
  6. Defendants Bush and Rockefeller, by virtue of their membership and high status within the organization, maintain constructive possession and control over these remains.
  7. Despite repeated demands from Apache descendants and First Nations representatives, Defendants have refused to return the remains or allow for an independent DNA audit of the contents of the High Street Tomb.

V. CAUSES OF ACTION

COUNT I: VIOLATION OF NAGPRA (25 U.S.C. § 3001 et seq.) 17. Plaintiff repeats and realleges the foregoing paragraphs. 18. The remains of Geronimo constitute “Native American cultural items” and “human remains” under the Act. 19. Defendant Yale University, as a recipient of federal funds, acts as a museum/repository under the definition of the Act. 20. Defendants have failed to inventory and repatriate these remains to the lineal descendants or the appropriate First Nations authorities represented by the Plaintiff.

COUNT II: CONVERSION 21. Plaintiff has a superior right to possession of the ancestral remains. 22. Defendants have intentionally exercised dominion and control over the remains in a manner inconsistent with the Plaintiff’s rights. 23. This conversion is ongoing and continuous, as the remains are used for alleged rituals within the High Street Tomb.

COUNT III: INTENTIONAL INFLICTION OF EMOTIONAL DISTRESS 24. The act of keeping the skull of a revered indigenous leader as a trophy or ritual object is extreme and outrageous conduct. 25. Defendants know, or should know, that such conduct causes severe emotional distress to the Plaintiff and the First Nations community.

COUNT IV: UNJUST ENRICHMENT 26. Defendants have unjustly enriched themselves by enhancing the mystique, notoriety, and recruitment power of their organization through the possession of these stolen historical remains.

VI. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff Trevor L. Carpenter prays for judgment against Defendants as follows:

A. A Declaration that the remains currently held in the Skull and Bones Tomb are those of Geronimo; B. An Order requiring Defendants to immediately surrender the remains to the Plaintiff for proper burial according to traditional customs; C. An Order granting Plaintiff access to the High Street Tomb to inspect and catalog any other indigenous artifacts or remains; D. Compensatory and Punitive damages in an amount to be determined at trial for the century of desecration and emotional distress; E. For costs of suit, reasonable attorney’s fees, and such other relief as the Court deems just and proper.

DEMAND FOR JURY TRIAL Plaintiff hereby demands a trial by jury on all issues so triable.

DATED: November 24, 2025

Respectfully submitted,

/s/ Mike Jukic

Mike Jukic, Esq. Lead Counsel AXISLAW.SITE Attorney for Plaintiff Trevor L. Carpenter, Chief of the Global First Nations

What do you think of this post?
  • Awesome (0)
  • Interesting (0)
  • Useful (0)
  • Boring (0)
  • Sucks (0)

Johnson & Johnson Lawsuit

Posted on by
Reply

IN THE [SUPERIOR COURT / FEDERAL COURT] OF [JURISDICTION]

Plaintiff:
Mike Jukic, Axis Law, on behalf of consumers of Johnson & Johnson products

Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and related subsidiaries

COMPLAINT

Plaintiff, by and through counsel, Axis Law, alleges as follows against Johnson & Johnson (“Defendant”):

I. INTRODUCTION

  1. This is an action seeking damages, restitution, and injunctive relief arising from Defendant’s manufacture, marketing, and sale of products that were contaminated, toxic, and hazardous to human health.
  2. Defendant has long represented itself as a trusted producer of consumer health and wellness products, while concealing and minimizing the risks associated with its talc-based baby powder, adhesive bandages, oral care products, and other consumer goods.

II. JURISDICTION AND VENUE

  1. Jurisdiction is proper in this Court because Defendant conducts business in this jurisdiction and sells its products nationwide and/or within the Province of [X].
  2. Venue is proper because Defendant maintains continuous and systematic contacts with this forum.

III. PARTIES

  1. Plaintiff Mike Jukic, of Axis Law, brings this suit on behalf of consumers who purchased and used Johnson & Johnson products, and who suffered injuries, increased health risks, or economic loss as a result of Defendant’s misconduct.
  2. Defendant Johnson & Johnson is a multinational corporation headquartered in New Brunswick, New Jersey, with numerous subsidiaries engaged in the manufacture and distribution of health and consumer products.

IV. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS

  1. Defendant’s talc-based baby powder has been scientifically linked to ovarian cancer, mesothelioma, and other illnesses due to asbestos contamination.
  2. Defendant sold and promoted this product for decades, targeting infants and women, while concealing evidence of contamination and health risks.
  3. Defendant’s bandages and adhesive products contained toxic adhesives, glues, and additives capable of causing skin irritation, allergic reactions, and potential systemic harm.
  4. Defendant’s toothpastes and oral care products contained harmful chemicals, including fluorides and preservatives, without adequate disclosure of risks.
  5. Defendant knowingly misrepresented these products as “safe,” “gentle,” and “trustworthy,” while suppressing or ignoring mounting scientific evidence of toxicity.
  6. As a direct and proximate result of Defendant’s misconduct, consumers—including vulnerable populations such as children and mothers—suffered physical harm, increased risk of disease, emotional distress, and economic loss.

V. CAUSES OF ACTION

Count I – Product Liability (Defective and Unreasonably Dangerous Products)
Count II – Failure to Warn
Count III – Negligence
Count IV – Fraudulent Concealment & Misrepresentation
Count V – Breach of Implied Warranties of Merchantability and Fitness
Count VI – Violation of Consumer Protection Statutes

VI. PRAYER FOR RELIEF

WHEREFORE, Plaintiff respectfully requests judgment against Defendant as follows:
A. Compensatory damages in an amount to be determined at trial;
B. Punitive damages for Defendant’s willful and reckless conduct;
C. Restitution and disgorgement of profits unjustly obtained;
D. Injunctive relief requiring full disclosure of product risks and removal of hazardous products from the market;
E. Attorneys’ fees and costs; and
F. Such other and further relief as this Court deems just and proper.

Dated: [Insert date]
Respectfully submitted,

Axis Law
By: ___________________________
Mike Jukic, Esq.
Attorney for Plaintiff

What do you think of this post?
  • Awesome (0)
  • Interesting (0)
  • Useful (0)
  • Boring (0)
  • Sucks (0)