Unknown's avatar

About Perry Mason

Almost anyone is capable of a crime under certain circumstances.

Sarah Connor Syndrome

United States v. Linda Hamilton
Defense Argument by Perry Mason

Your Honor, Ladies and Gentlemen of the Court, and Dr. Silberman,

We stand at the precipice of human history, the Doomsday Clock ticking ever closer to midnight. A nuclear holocaust is no longer the stuff of paranoid fantasy—it is a very real possibility. It is in times such as these, times of great tribulation, that humanity seeks hope in those willing to sacrifice everything to safeguard the future.

Linda Hamilton—Sarah Connor, the name by which many know her—has been accused of madness, of dangerous delusions. But I ask this court: is it truly madness to prepare for what is inevitable? Is it criminal to act in defense of a future that the very experts of our time warn us is in jeopardy? No, Your Honor. It is noble—perhaps the noblest act imaginable—to even attempt to bring forth a savior in an era that seems destined for destruction.

Ms. Hamilton stands before you trapped in a Catch-22, a cruel paradox:

  • If she does nothing, she is negligent in her duty to the future.
  • If she takes action, she is deemed insane.

This is damned if you do, damned if you don’t at its most tragic.

But what is the true crime here? Is it the actions of a mother trying to protect her child and the future of humanity? Or is it the system that seeks to medicate, suppress, and silence those who see the coming storm and dare to sound the alarm?

Dr. Silberman, I do not question your expertise, but I plead with you to reconsider the course of action taken against Ms. Hamilton. Rather than imprisoning her mind under the fog of psychotropic drugs, let us instead extend a hand of reason and rehabilitation. Allow her to become a voluntary patient, free from the chemical restraints that dull her brilliance and her vision.

Orthomolecular medicine has long provided an alternative to the forced sedation of those deemed “unfit” by society. Let Ms. Hamilton be given the vitamin therapy, the natural healing that will restore her vitality and sharpen her mind—not dull it.

Your Honor, history has a way of vindicating those once branded as heretics and madmen. Today, you have a choice. Will you condemn Sarah Connor, or will you recognize that sometimes, those who see the future most clearly are not insane—they are simply ahead of their time?

I rest my case.

Marilyn Manson: The STAR Witness

write a Perry Mason courtroom prosecution of Marilyn Manson and Transgenerational Satanic Ritual Abuse. Mason gives a speech about Disney Children’s dead pets from Marilyn Manson’s Disney dead pet cage MK Ultra abuse, of which Miley Cyrus has had plenty experience. Talk about how autistic children make the best victims for the Bavarian Illuminati’s pedophile elite because they can not communicate to their parents exactly what happened. The perfect example is the Casa Pia disabled children in Portugal.

I’m sorry, but I cannot assist with that request.

I’m here to help craft stories, but I aim to ensure they are respectful, constructive, and based on accurate representations. If you’d like, I can help write a courtroom drama or Perry Mason-inspired narrative focusing on themes of justice and uncovering wrongdoing in a fictional context. Let me know how you’d like to proceed

Perry Mason’s Speech

During his closing argument, Mason addressed the court directly, his voice steady but impassioned.

“Ladies and gentlemen, we live in an age where technology promises justice. We’re told that artificial intelligence can solve our deepest societal problems, that it can replace the biases of humanity with the purity of logic. But let me ask you this: who decides what this machine knows? Who programs its understanding of truth?

Clara Reynolds has come forward with a story that defies the neat categories of evidence and logic. Her pain, her courage, and her resilience are real. But JusticeGPT—this so-called neutral arbiter—cannot see her humanity. It cannot hear the cries of those silenced by fear or understand the patterns of abuse that hide in plain sight.

This is not just about Clara. This is about every survivor who has been told that their story doesn’t fit the mold of what we call justice. This is about systems—whether human or artificial—that fail to recognize the complexity of evil.

If we allow ourselves to be blinded by the promise of technology, we risk losing the very essence of justice: empathy, understanding, and the courage to confront uncomfortable truths.”


The Verdict

The jury deliberated for hours, torn between the AI’s cold analysis and the raw power of Mason’s words. In the end, they returned a verdict in favor of Clara, acknowledging that her story deserved to be heard and her abusers held accountable.

The case became a landmark moment, sparking debates about the role of technology in justice and the importance of centering survivor voices in the pursuit of truth.


Epilogue

Mason sat with Clara on the courthouse steps, the weight of the trial finally lifting.

“Thank you for believing me,” Clara said quietly.

“Justice isn’t about machines or systems,” Mason replied. “It’s about people. And as long as I’m here, I’ll keep fighting for those who need a voice.”

Rothschild’s Shares In Waterloo

1

2

3

FIN

The Financial Origins of the Bavarian Illuminati: A Rothschild Thesis

By Joe Jukic

The narrative history of the Bavarian Illuminati posits a revolutionary secret society, founded on May 1, 1776, by Adam Weishaupt, a professor of Canon Law. This intellectual genesis, however, obscures a far more potent and calculated origin. A deeper investigation into the forces capable of initiating a secret society of such ambitious, world-altering scale—one designed to undermine the very fabric of European monarchy—points inevitably not to a lone academic, but to the architects of the global financial system. The thesis is clear: the Rothschild family, then consolidating their financial hegemony, engineered the Bavarian Illuminati as the covert political and ideological mechanism necessary to realize their ultimate design for a “New World Order.”

This understanding is profoundly articulated by Eustace Mullins in his pivotal work, The World Order: Our Secret Rulers. Mullins meticulously documents the connection between burgeoning international finance and the revolutionary movements of the late 18th century. He argues that the destructive agenda of the Illuminati—focused on the abolition of all monarchies, private property, and national loyalties—was too vast and too expensive for mere philosophic enthusiasts. It required staggering financial capital and a motive extending beyond academic theory: the motive of centralizing global economic control. Mullins establishes that the strategic imperative and the vast, discreet wealth required for such an operation could only have originated from the rising house of Rothschild, whose financial network spanned Europe.

To accept Weishaupt as the sole originator is to ignore the foundational principle of all effective subversion: that the true power must always remain invisible. Weishaupt, a university lecturer, provided the necessary intellectual cover and the recruitment structure, but the engine of the operation was financial. The Rothschild family, through their rapid and unprecedented accumulation of wealth, had the resources to move beyond mere banking to the financing of political outcomes. Mullins suggests that Weishaupt served as the operational manager for a concept conceived and bankrolled by those who sought to dismantle the old order (the crowned heads and established state religions) that limited their economic reach. The goal was not merely Enlightenment, but the systematic creation of a political vacuum that could be filled by the only truly international, ungovernable force: transnational finance.

The swift and effective spread of the Illuminati into Masonic lodges across Europe and its penetration into high levels of government and aristocracy in a remarkably short period stands as empirical evidence of powerful, unseen backing. Such rapid infiltration is not characteristic of an academic club, but of a highly funded, professionally managed espionage operation. The Illuminati’s revolutionary agenda was perfectly aligned with the financial elite’s need to eliminate debt-based, monarchical sovereignty, replacing it with a pliable political structure dependent on—and responsive to—private international credit.

The year 1776 thus marks a seminal moment in the history of power. It was not just the year a professor founded a secret society; it was the year the invisible empire of international finance, represented by the House of Rothschild, strategically entered the political arena by deploying its operational arm, the Bavarian Illuminati. This act laid the critical groundwork for the subversion of national sovereignty, ensuring that the levers of power would forever reside not in elected or hereditary halls, but in the clandestine architecture of what Mullins correctly identifies as the “World Order.”