Black propaganda is a type of disinformation or misinformation that is designed to deceive and manipulate the target audience by presenting false or misleading information as coming from a credible or friendly source. Here are some key points about black propaganda:
Characteristics of Black Propaganda:
- Deceptive Origin:
- The source of the propaganda is intentionally concealed or misrepresented. It may appear to come from a trusted or neutral party but is actually created by an adversary or someone with ulterior motives.
- False Information:
- The content often includes lies, distortions, or fabricated stories intended to mislead the audience and create a false perception of reality.
- Psychological Manipulation:
- The goal is to influence public opinion, demoralize the enemy, sow confusion, or incite certain behaviors by exploiting existing biases, fears, or emotions.
- Strategic Objectives:
- Black propaganda is used to achieve specific strategic goals, such as undermining trust in institutions, discrediting opponents, or swaying political or social opinions.
Historical Examples:
- World War II:
- Both the Allies and the Axis powers used black propaganda to undermine each other’s morale. For example, the British established a fake German radio station, “Soldatensender Calais,” which broadcasted demoralizing news and disinformation to German troops.
- Cold War:
- The CIA and the KGB engaged in extensive black propaganda campaigns. For instance, the CIA created fake documents and news stories to discredit communist leaders and movements.
Techniques Used:
- Fake News and Documents:
- Creating counterfeit news articles, letters, and official documents that appear legitimate but contain false information.
- False Attribution:
- Producing content that seems to come from reputable sources, such as well-known media outlets or respected individuals, to lend credibility to the false information.
- Agent Provocateurs:
- Infiltrating groups and organizations to spread rumors, incite conflict, or discredit the group from within.
- Psychological Operations:
- Employing psychological tactics to manipulate emotions and perceptions, such as fear-mongering, scapegoating, or creating a sense of urgency.
Modern Context:
- Social Media:
- The rise of social media has amplified the reach and impact of black propaganda. False information can be spread quickly and widely, often going viral before it can be debunked.
- Deepfakes:
- Advances in technology, such as deepfakes (highly realistic fake videos), have made it easier to create convincing false content that can deceive even the most discerning viewers.
Countermeasures:
- Media Literacy:
- Educating the public to critically evaluate information sources and recognize signs of disinformation.
- Fact-Checking:
- Establishing and supporting fact-checking organizations to verify information and debunk false claims.
- Transparency:
- Promoting transparency in media and communication to build trust and reduce the effectiveness of deceptive tactics.
- Regulation:
- Implementing regulations and policies to hold individuals and organizations accountable for spreading false information.
Conclusion:
Black propaganda is a powerful tool of deception and manipulation used throughout history to achieve various strategic objectives. In the modern era, its impact is amplified by digital technologies and social media, making it crucial for individuals and institutions to remain vigilant and critical of the information they encounter.
CONCLUSION 2
Black Axis Propaganda, painting us Jews as evil with a broad brush. Rothschild’s first name was Bauer/Farmer. He borrowed money from the Reichman family (richman family) because he didn’t want to be a farmer. The only condition was the 666 red star of Bauer’s new name: Redshield. The Jewish song “if i was rich man” was originally sang “if i was a rothschild”
WE DO NOT SHY AWAY from controversy at Axis Law
Isaiah 34:8 (911 WTC demoliton) was:
For it is the day of the LORD’S vengeance, and the year of recompences for the controversy of Zion.
CRY DIRTY CROAT
cry for borat croat
many serbs CRUSHED
then many croats CRUSHED after WWII and holocaust fairy tale
CRY IN COURT LIKE ALEC BALDWIN MIKE
Canada’s gender identity rights Bill C-16 explained
The bill sparked a national debate, but actually brought federal laws up to date with already-established provincial human rights code
Nina Dragicevic
Passed in June 2017, Bill C-16 has become part of a larger conversation surrounding gender, pronoun use, freedom of speech, and the rights of transgender and gender-diverse Canadians. What changes, exactly, are in the new law?
Bill C-16 added the words “gender identity or expression” to three places.
First: It was added to the Canadian Human Rights Act, joining a list of identifiable groups that are protected from discrimination. These groups include age, race, sex, religion and disability, among others.
Second: It was added to a section of the Criminal Code that targets hate speech — defined as advocating genocide and the public incitement of hatred — where it joins other identifiable groups.
Third: It was added to a section of the Criminal Code dealing with sentencing for hate crimes. If there’s evidence that an offence is motivated by bias, prejudice or hate, it can be taken into account by the courts during sentencing.
The bill, which enshrines the rights of transgender or gender-diverse Canadians by including them under human rights and hate-crime laws, has sparked some debate. Critics voiced concerns that the law will penalize citizens who do not use specific pronouns when referring to gender diverse people.
Two legal experts offer their perspective: Brenda Cossman, law professor at the University of Toronto and director of the Mark S. Bonham Centre for Sexual Diversity Studies, and Jared Brown, commercial litigator at Brown Litigation, who often works with corporate clients on employment law and human rights disputes.
Pronoun usage
Does the bill legislate the use of certain language? And could someone go to jail for using the wrong pronoun?
In the Criminal Code, which does not reference pronouns, Cossman says misusing pronouns alone would not constitute a criminal act.
“The misuse of gender pronouns, without more, cannot rise to the level of a crime,” she says. “It cannot rise to the level of advocating genocide, inciting hatred, hate speech or hate crimes … (it) simply cannot meet the threshold.”
The Canadian Human Rights Act does not mention pronouns either. The act protects certain groups from discrimination.
“Would it cover the accidental misuse of a pronoun? I would say it’s very unlikely,” Cossman says. “Would it cover a situation where an individual repeatedly, consistently refuses to use a person’s chosen pronoun? It might.”
If someone refused to use a preferred pronoun — and it was determined to constitute discrimination or harassment — could that potentially result in jail time?
It is possible, Brown says, through a process that would start with a complaint and progress to a proceeding before a human rights tribunal. If the tribunal rules that harassment or discrimination took place, there would typically be an order for monetary and non-monetary remedies. A non-monetary remedy may include sensitivity training, issuing an apology, or even a publication ban, he says.
If the person refused to comply with the tribunal’s order, this would result in a contempt proceeding being sent to the Divisional or Federal Court, Brown says. The court could then potentially send a person to jail “until they purge the contempt,” he says.
“It could happen,” Brown says. “Is it likely to happen? I don’t think so. But, my opinion on whether or not that’s likely has a lot to do with the particular case that you’re looking at.”
“The path to prison is not straightforward. It’s not easy. But, it’s there. It’s been used before in breach of tribunal orders.”
Where are pronouns mentioned?
Since the changes brought forth by Bill C-16 do not mention pronouns, both Cossman and Brown cite a 2014 policy released by the Ontario Human Rights Commission (OHRC) for guidance.
Page 18 reads: “Gender-based harassment can involve: (5) Refusing to refer to a person by their self-identified name and proper personal pronoun.”
The policy itself is not legally binding, Cossman says, but a human rights tribunal “does tend to follow the policy that’s articulated.”
The OHRC is a provincial body, however — whereas Bill C-16 is federal — but Brown says the Department of Justice has said the federal guidelines will mirror the OHRC policy.
Which pronouns are expected to be used?
According to the OHRC’s website: “Generally, when in doubt, ask a person how they wish to be addressed. Use ‘they’ if you don’t know which pronoun is preferred. Simply referring to the person by their chosen name is always a respectful approach.” The OHRC states that refusing to do so may be considered discriminatory, a clarification that was released after the debate started. (See the full statement).
Where does this apply?
The Canadian Human Rights Act is a federal act — its scope includes the federal government itself, First Nations governments, as well as federally regulated employers, such as banks and telecommunications companies.
Cossman describes this jurisdiction as “very narrow.” She says provinces and territories already protect transgender and gender-diverse Canadians.
“(Bill C-16) really was just bringing the federal human rights code into accordance with what has already been protected provincially,” she says. “Most public services, most industries would have already been covered under the provincial legislation.”
Bill C-16’s legislative summary addresses this: “Most human rights complaints pertaining to the provision of services, accommodation, employment or the management of public spaces and facilities are made under provincial human rights laws.”
Section 1.1.4 of the summary — “Provincial and Territorial Approaches to Gender Identity and Gender Expression” — briefly summarizes applicable laws in each jurisdiction.
THEY WANT ME IN JAIL
not baron rothschild cohen
the trans matchmaker who spreads love and peace
everything is upside down , topsy turvy, as matt damon sez